Literature DB >> 18479403

Selection bias and utilization of the dual eligibles in Medicare and Medicaid HMOs.

Hui Zhang1, Robert L Kane, Bryan Dowd, Roger Feldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the existence of selection bias in the first 3 years of the Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO) demonstration and to estimate the MSHO effects on medical services utilization after adjusting for selection bias. DATA SOURCES: Monthly dual eligibility data and MSHO encounter data of March 1997-December 2000 and Medicaid encounter data of January 1995-December 2000 from the Minnesota Department of Human Services; Medicare fee-for-service claims data of January 1995-December 2000 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. STUDY
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design comparing utilization between MSHO and control groups; multiple econometric and statistical models were estimated with time-invariant and time-varying covariates. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Favorable MSHO selection was found in the nursing home (NH) and community populations, but selection bias did not substantially affect the findings. Enrollment in MSHO for more than 1 year reduced inpatient hospital admissions and days, emergency room and physician visits for NH residents, and lowered physician visits for community residents.
CONCLUSIONS: There was favorable selection in the first 3 years of the MSHO program. Enrollment in MSHO reduced several types of utilization for the NH group and physician visits for community enrollees. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18479403      PMCID: PMC2653890          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00861.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Managed care of chronically ill older people: the US experience.

Authors:  C Boult; R L Kane; R Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-21

2.  Do Medicare HMOs still reduce health services use after controlling for selection bias?

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Sally C Stearns; Edward C Norton
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Rare outcomes, common treatments: analytic strategies using propensity scores.

Authors:  Leonard E Braitman; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Clinical challenges in the care of frail older persons.

Authors:  Robert L Kane
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  The effect of Evercare on hospital use.

Authors:  Robert L Kane; Gail Keckhafer; Shannon Flood; Boris Bershadsky; Mir Said Siadaty
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Understanding biased selection in Medicare HMOs.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Sally C Stearns; Edward C Norton; Thomas C Ricketts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  The effect of benefits, premiums, and health risk on health plan choice in the Medicare program.

Authors:  Adam Atherly; Bryan E Dowd; Roger Feldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Estimating treatment effects using observational data.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Geriatrics as a paradigm for good chronic care.

Authors:  Robert L Kane
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.668

View more
  2 in total

1.  Treatment disparities following the diagnosis of an astrocytoma.

Authors:  Paula R Sherwood; Bassam A Dahman; Heidi S Donovan; Arlan Mintz; Charles W Given; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Varied differences in the health status between Medicare advantage and fee-for-service enrollees.

Authors:  Yunjie Song
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.