Literature DB >> 18479339

Fidelity and breeding probability related to population density and individual quality in black brent geese Branta bernicla nigricans.

J S Sedinger1, N D Chelgren, D H Ward, M S Lindberg.   

Abstract

1. Patterns of temporary emigration (associated with non-breeding) are important components of variation in individual quality. Permanent emigration from the natal area has important implications for both individual fitness and local population dynamics. 2. We estimated both permanent and temporary emigration of black brent geese (Branta bernicla nigricans Lawrence) from the Tutakoke River colony, using observations of marked brent geese on breeding and wintering areas, and recoveries of ringed individuals by hunters. We used the likelihood developed by Lindberg, Kendall, Hines & Anderson 2001 (Combining band recovery data and Pollock's robust design to model temporary and permanent emigration. Biometrics, 57, 273-281) to assess hypotheses and estimate parameters. 3. Temporary emigration (the converse of breeding) varied among age classes up to age 5, and differed between individuals that bred in the previous years vs. those that did not. Consistent with the hypothesis of variation in individual quality, individuals with a higher probability of breeding in one year also had a higher probability of breeding the next year. 4. Natal fidelity of females ranged from 0.70 +/- 0.07-0.96 +/- 0.18 and averaged 0.83. In contrast to Lindberg et al. (1998), we did not detect a relationship between fidelity and local population density. Natal fidelity was negatively correlated with first-year survival, suggesting that competition among individuals of the same age for breeding territories influenced dispersal. Once females nested at the Tutakoke River, colony breeding fidelity was 1.0. 5. Our analyses show substantial variation in individual quality associated with fitness, which other analyses suggest is strongly influenced by early environment. Our analyses also suggest substantial interchange among breeding colonies of brent geese, as first shown by Lindberg et al. (1998).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18479339     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01403.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  5 in total

1.  The impact of sea ice conditions on breeding decisions is modulated by body condition in an arctic partial capital breeder.

Authors:  Frankie Jean-Gagnon; P Legagneux; G Gilchrist; S Bélanger; O P Love; J Bêty
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Migratory goose arrival time plays a larger role in influencing forage quality than advancing springs in an Arctic coastal wetland.

Authors:  Karen H Beard; Ryan T Choi; A Joshua Leffler; Lindsay G Carlson; Katharine C Kelsey; Joel A Schmutz; Jeffrey M Welker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Individual heterogeneity in black brant survival and recruitment with implications for harvest dynamics.

Authors:  Mark S Lindberg; James S Sedinger; Jean-Dominique Lebreton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Conditions during adulthood affect cohort-specific reproductive success in an Arctic-nesting goose population.

Authors:  Mitch D Weegman; Stuart Bearhop; Geoff M Hilton; Alyn Walsh; Anthony David Fox
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Should I stay or should I go? Fitness costs and benefits of prolonged parent-offspring and sibling-sibling associations in an Arctic-nesting goose population.

Authors:  Mitch D Weegman; Stuart Bearhop; Geoff M Hilton; Alyn J Walsh; Kaitlin M Weegman; David J Hodgson; Anthony David Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.