Literature DB >> 18478422

The relative cost of biomass energy transport.

Erin Searcy1, Peter Flynn, Emad Ghafoori, Amit Kumar.   

Abstract

Logistics cost, the cost of moving feedstock or products, is a key component of the overall cost of recovering energy from biomass. In this study, we calculate for small- and large-project sizes, the relative cost of transportation by truck, rail, ship, and pipeline for three biomass feedstocks, by truck and pipeline for ethanol, and by transmission line for electrical power. Distance fixed costs (loading and unloading) and distance variable costs (transport, including power losses during transmission), are calculated for each biomass type and mode of transportation. Costs are normalized to a common basis of a giga Joules of biomass. The relative cost of moving products vs feedstock is an approximate measure of the incentive for location of biomass processing at the source of biomass, rather than at the point of ultimate consumption of produced energy. In general, the cost of transporting biomass is more than the cost of transporting its energy products. The gap in cost for transporting biomass vs power is significantly higher than the incremental cost of building and operating a power plant remote from a transmission grid. The cost of power transmission and ethanol transport by pipeline is highly dependent on scale of project. Transport of ethanol by truck has a lower cost than by pipeline up to capacities of 1800 t/d. The high cost of transshipment to a ship precludes shipping from being an economical mode of transport for distances less than 800 km (woodchips) and 1500 km (baled agricultural residues).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18478422     DOI: 10.1007/s12010-007-9085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  6 in total

1.  Opportunities and Challenges in the Design and Analysis of Biomass Supply Chains.

Authors:  Pasi T Lautala; Michael R Hilliard; Erin Webb; Ingrid Busch; J Richard Hess; Mohammad S Roni; Jorge Hilbert; Robert M Handler; Roger Bittencourt; Amir Valente; Tuuli Laitinen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Engineering secondary cell wall deposition in plants.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Prajakta Mitra; Ling Zhang; Lina Prak; Yves Verhertbruggen; Jin-Sun Kim; Lan Sun; Kejian Zheng; Kexuan Tang; Manfred Auer; Henrik V Scheller; Dominique Loqué
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.803

3.  Restricting lignin and enhancing sugar deposition in secondary cell walls enhances monomeric sugar release after low temperature ionic liquid pretreatment.

Authors:  Chessa Scullin; Alejandro G Cruz; Yi-De Chuang; Blake A Simmons; Dominique Loque; Seema Singh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Vapor-fed bio-hybrid fuel cell.

Authors:  Marcus S Benyamin; Justin P Jahnke; David M Mackie
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Gene stacking of multiple traits for high yield of fermentable sugars in plant biomass.

Authors:  Aude Aznar; Camille Chalvin; Patrick M Shih; Michael Maimann; Berit Ebert; Devon S Birdseye; Dominique Loqué; Henrik V Scheller
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Next-generation biomass feedstocks for biofuel production.

Authors:  Blake A Simmons; Dominique Loque; Harvey W Blanch
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 13.583

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.