Kelly R Evenson1, Merry-K Moos, Kathryn Carrier, Anna Maria Siega-Riz. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 137 East Franklin Street, Bank of America Center, Suite 306, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA. kelly_evenson@unc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity generally declines during pregnancy, but barriers to activity during this time period are not well understood. The objective was to examine barriers to physical activity in a large cohort of pregnant women and to explore these barriers in more depth with qualitative data derived from a separate focus group study using a socioecologic framework. METHOD: A total of 1535 pregnant women (27-30 weeks' gestation) enrolled in the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition Study were asked an open-ended question about their primary barrier to physical activity; responses were coded into categories according to the socioecologic framework. To further elucidate, 13 focus groups of a total of 58 pregnant women (20-37 weeks' gestation) were conducted among Hispanic, African American, and White participants. RESULTS: Among the 1535 pregnant women participating in the survey, 85% reported an intrapersonal barrier to physical activity, of which almost two-thirds were health related. Only 2% of the women reported their main barrier to physical activity as interpersonal and 3% reported a neighborhood or environmental barrier. These results were supported by the focus group data, overall and by race/ethnicity and body mass index. Although women discussed barriers to physical activity at a variety of levels, the intrapersonal level was the most frequently cited and discussed factor in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Since pregnancy may trigger the development of obesity and since physical activity is recommended for healthy pregnant women, it is imperative to promote physical activity in a more relevant way. These quantitative and qualitative studies revealed many barriers to physical activity among pregnant women and some suggestions for interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity generally declines during pregnancy, but barriers to activity during this time period are not well understood. The objective was to examine barriers to physical activity in a large cohort of pregnant women and to explore these barriers in more depth with qualitative data derived from a separate focus group study using a socioecologic framework. METHOD: A total of 1535 pregnant women (27-30 weeks' gestation) enrolled in the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition Study were asked an open-ended question about their primary barrier to physical activity; responses were coded into categories according to the socioecologic framework. To further elucidate, 13 focus groups of a total of 58 pregnant women (20-37 weeks' gestation) were conducted among Hispanic, African American, and White participants. RESULTS: Among the 1535 pregnant women participating in the survey, 85% reported an intrapersonal barrier to physical activity, of which almost two-thirds were health related. Only 2% of the women reported their main barrier to physical activity as interpersonal and 3% reported a neighborhood or environmental barrier. These results were supported by the focus group data, overall and by race/ethnicity and body mass index. Although women discussed barriers to physical activity at a variety of levels, the intrapersonal level was the most frequently cited and discussed factor in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Since pregnancy may trigger the development of obesity and since physical activity is recommended for healthy pregnant women, it is imperative to promote physical activity in a more relevant way. These quantitative and qualitative studies revealed many barriers to physical activity among pregnant women and some suggestions for interventions.
Authors: Jennifer Notkin Nielsen; Kimberly O O'Brien; Frank R Witter; Shih-Chen Chang; Jeri Mancini; Maureen Schulman Nathanson; Laura E Caulfield Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jennifer L Huberty; Matthew P Buman; Jenn A Leiferman; Jessica Bushar; Eric B Hekler; Marc A Adams Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Debbie M Smith; Melissa Whitworth; Colin Sibley; Wendy Taylor; Jane Gething; Catherine Chmiel; Tina Lavender Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Leonie K Callaway; Paul B Colditz; Nuala M Byrne; Barbara E Lingwood; Ingrid J Rowlands; Katie Foxcroft; H David McIntyre Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 19.112