Tarek Hewezi1, Mathieu Léger, Laurent Gentzbittel. 1. Laboratoire de Biotechnologies et Amélioration des Plantes (BAP), INP-ENSAT, Pôle de Biotechnologies Végétales, IFR 40, 18 Chemin de Borde Rouge, BP107, Auzeville, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France. hewezi@iastate.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although high light (HL) and high temperature (HT) stresses have been extensively investigated, a global analysis of their combined effects on the transcriptome of any plant species has not yet been described. Sunflower is an agronomically important oil crop frequently subjected to these stress factors. Because results in model plants may not always translate well to crop plants, responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) to HL, HT and a combination of both stresses were analysed by profiling gene expression in leaves and immature seeds. METHODS: Plants were grown in HL (600 microE m(-2) s(-1)), HT (35 degrees C) and a combination of HL and HT (HL + HT), and gene expression in leaves and immature seeds was profiled using cDNA microarrays containing more than 8000 putative unigenes. KEY RESULTS: Using two-way analysis of variance, 105, 55 and 129 cDNA clones were identified showing significant changes in steady-state transcript levels, across the two tissues, in response to HL, HT and HL + HT, respectively. A significant number of these transcripts were found to be specific to each stress. Comparing gene expression profiles between leaves and immature seeds revealed that 89, 113 and 186 cDNA clones can be considered as differentially expressed in response to HL, HT and HL + HT, respectively. More than half of the cDNA clones showing significant differences between embryo and leaf tissues in response to HL + HT were specific to this stress. Significant differences between leaves and seeds shared by all three stress treatments were observed for only eight genes. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results indicate that vegetative and reproductive tissues employ different transcriptome responses to these stress treatments. Careful examination of the putative functions of these genes revealed novel and specific responses. The potential roles of many of the differentially expressed genes in stress tolerance are mentioned and discussed.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although high light (HL) and high temperature (HT) stresses have been extensively investigated, a global analysis of their combined effects on the transcriptome of any plant species has not yet been described. Sunflower is an agronomically important oil crop frequently subjected to these stress factors. Because results in model plants may not always translate well to crop plants, responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) to HL, HT and a combination of both stresses were analysed by profiling gene expression in leaves and immature seeds. METHODS: Plants were grown in HL (600 microE m(-2) s(-1)), HT (35 degrees C) and a combination of HL and HT (HL + HT), and gene expression in leaves and immature seeds was profiled using cDNA microarrays containing more than 8000 putative unigenes. KEY RESULTS: Using two-way analysis of variance, 105, 55 and 129 cDNA clones were identified showing significant changes in steady-state transcript levels, across the two tissues, in response to HL, HT and HL + HT, respectively. A significant number of these transcripts were found to be specific to each stress. Comparing gene expression profiles between leaves and immature seeds revealed that 89, 113 and 186 cDNA clones can be considered as differentially expressed in response to HL, HT and HL + HT, respectively. More than half of the cDNA clones showing significant differences between embryo and leaf tissues in response to HL + HT were specific to this stress. Significant differences between leaves and seeds shared by all three stress treatments were observed for only eight genes. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results indicate that vegetative and reproductive tissues employ different transcriptome responses to these stress treatments. Careful examination of the putative functions of these genes revealed novel and specific responses. The potential roles of many of the differentially expressed genes in stress tolerance are mentioned and discussed.
Authors: A Brazma; P Hingamp; J Quackenbush; G Sherlock; P Spellman; C Stoeckert; J Aach; W Ansorge; C A Ball; H C Causton; T Gaasterland; P Glenisson; F C Holstege; I F Kim; V Markowitz; J C Matese; H Parkinson; A Robinson; U Sarkans; S Schulze-Kremer; J Stewart; R Taylor; J Vilo; M Vingron Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: R D Wolfinger; G Gibson; E D Wolfinger; L Bennett; H Hamadeh; P Bushel; C Afshari; R S Paules Journal: J Comput Biol Date: 2001 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Chan Ju Lim; Kyung Ae Yang; Joon Ki Hong; Jin Soo Choi; Dea-Jin Yun; Jong Chan Hong; Woo Sik Chung; Sang Yeol Lee; Moo Je Cho; Chae Oh Lim Journal: J Plant Res Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Damián Balfagón; Soham Sengupta; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; Felix B Fritschi; Rajeev K Azad; Ron Mittler; Sara I Zandalinas Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Damián Balfagón; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; José L Rambla; Antonio Granell; Carlos de Ollas; Diane C Bassham; Ron Mittler; Sara I Zandalinas Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Michela Janni; Mariolina Gullì; Elena Maestri; Marta Marmiroli; Babu Valliyodan; Henry T Nguyen; Nelson Marmiroli Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Sebastian Moschen; Sofia Bengoa Luoni; Norma B Paniego; H Esteban Hopp; Guillermo A A Dosio; Paula Fernandez; Ruth A Heinz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 3.240