Literature DB >> 18477330

Screening for skin carriage of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skin.

Gregory C Griffeth1, Daniel O Morris, Jill L Abraham, Frances S Shofer, Shelley C Rankin.   

Abstract

Methicillin resistance rates of 41% for Staphylococcus aureus, 16% for S. intermedius, and 40% for S. schleiferi have recently been reported in canine patients. These were deemed to be reflective of referral and clinician-selection biases, which would imply significantly lower methicillin-resistant staphylococcal carriage rates in less-biased canine populations. In this study, swabs for bacterial culture were collected from five cutaneous sites on each of 50 healthy dogs and 59 dogs with inflammatory skin disease to determine prevalence of carriage and relative frequency of methicillin resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci and S. schleiferi ssp. schleiferi. These were identified morphologically and by Gram's staining, catalase and coagulase testing, and biochemical speciation. Coagulase-positive staphylococci and S. schleiferi ssp. schleiferi were isolated from 88% (52 of 59) of affected dogs. Species identified in the culture-positive dogs were: S. aureus in 12%, S. intermedius (92%), S. schleiferi ssp. schleiferi (10%), and S. schleiferi ssp. coagulans (10%) with methicillin resistance rates of 17%, 8%, 20% and 20%, respectively. Coagulase-positive staphylococci were isolated from 74% (37 of 50) of healthy dogs: S. aureus (16%), S. intermedius (92%) and S. schleiferi ssp. coagulans (5%). Methicillin resistance rates were 0%, 3% and 50%, respectively. Of total methicillin-resistant isolates, 11 of 13 were positive for PBP2a via latex agglutination. Methicillin-resistant S. intermedius and S. schleiferi ssp. schleiferi isolates were all positive for the mecA gene via PCR. There was no significant difference in staphylococcal isolation or methicillin resistance between study groups. While present, methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci are significantly less common in these less-biased populations than in the clinical isolates previously reported from this institution which provided the impetus for this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18477330     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Dermatol        ISSN: 0959-4493            Impact factor:   1.589


  39 in total

1.  Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion and MIC Breakpoints Established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for Detection of mecA-Mediated Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus schleiferi.

Authors:  H K Huse; S A Miller; S Chandrasekaran; J A Hindler; S D Lawhon; D A Bemis; L F Westblade; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in canine pyoderma cases in primary care veterinary practices in Canada: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Daniel Joffe; Fiona Goulding; Ken Langelier; Gabor Magyar; Les McCurdy; Moe Milstein; Kia Nielsen; Stephanie Villemaire
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Evidence of multiple virulence subtypes in nosocomial and community-associated MRSA genotypes in companion animals from the upper midwestern and northeastern United States.

Authors:  Yihan Lin; Emily Barker; Jennifer Kislow; Pravin Kaldhone; Mary E Stemper; Madhulatha Pantrangi; Frances M Moore; Matthew Hall; Thomas R Fritsche; Thomas Novicki; Steven L Foley; Sanjay K Shukla
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2010-08-25

4.  Commensal Staphylococci Including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Dogs and Cats in Remote New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Gemma C Ma; Kate A Worthing; Michael P Ward; Jacqueline M Norris
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Breeder-reported patterns of antimicrobial use and point prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. among breeding bitches in the southwestern United States.

Authors:  Brooke J Simon; J Scott Weese; Anthea E Schick; Thomas P Lewis
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 6.  Escherichia coli and selected veterinary and zoonotic pathogens isolated from environmental sites in companion animal veterinary hospitals in southern Ontario.

Authors:  Colleen P Murphy; Richard J Reid-Smith; Patrick Boerlin; J Scott Weese; John F Prescott; Nicol Janecko; Lori Hassard; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from various animals.

Authors:  Joseph E Rubin; Katherine R Ball; Manuel Chirino-Trejo
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.008

8.  Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains isolated from clinical samples of animal origin.

Authors:  D Chrobak; M Kizerwetter-Świda; M Rzewuska; A Moodley; L Guardabassi; M Binek
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Staphylococci isolated from carriage sites and infected sites of dogs as a reservoir of multidrug resistance and methicillin resistance.

Authors:  Katarzyna Garbacz; Sabina Żarnowska; Lidia Piechowicz; Krystyna Haras
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius colonizing healthy dogs in Saskatoon, Canada.

Authors:  Roshan Priyantha; Mathew C Gaunt; Joseph E Rubin
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.008

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.