Literature DB >> 18476772

Heterogeneous memory T cells in antiviral immunity and immunopathology.

David Verhoeven1, John R Teijaro, Donna L Farber.   

Abstract

Memory T cells are generated following an initial viral infection, and have the potential for mediating robust protective immunity to viral re-challenge due to their rapid and enhanced functional responses. In recent years, it has become clear that the memory T cell response to most viruses is remarkably diverse in phenotype, function, and tissue distribution, and can undergo dynamic changes during its long-term maintenance in vivo. However, the role of this variegation and compartmentalizationof memory T cells in protective immunity to viruses remains unclear. In this review,we discuss the diverse features of memory T cells that can delineate different subsets, the characteristics of memory T cells thus far identified to promote protective immune responses, and how the heterogeneous nature of memory T cells may also promote immunopathology during antiviral responses. We propose that given the profound heterogeneity of memory T cells, regulation of memory T cells during secondary responses could focus the response to participation of specific subsets,and/or inhibit memory T-cell subsets and functions that can lead to immunopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18476772      PMCID: PMC2996251          DOI: 10.1089/vim.2008.0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viral Immunol        ISSN: 0882-8245            Impact factor:   2.257


  169 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of the memory CD4 T cell response: persisting effectors and resting memory T cells.

Authors:  M Ahmadzadeh; S F Hussain; D L Farber
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Functional subsets of memory T cells identified by CCR7 expression.

Authors:  F Sallusto; A Langenkamp; J Geginat; A Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Phenotypic changes associated with activation of CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ T cells.

Authors:  D L Wallace; P C Beverley
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Protection against immunopathological consequences of a viral infection by activated but not resting cytotoxic T cells: T cell memory without "memory T cells"?

Authors:  M F Bachmann; T M Kündig; H Hengartner; R M Zinkernagel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Human vascular endothelial cells stimulate memory but not naive CD8+ T cells to differentiate into CTL retaining an early activation phenotype.

Authors:  T J Dengler; J S Pober
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  A monoclonal antibody to murine CD45R distinguishes CD4 T cell populations that produce different cytokines.

Authors:  K Bottomly; M Luqman; L Greenbaum; S Carding; J West; T Pasqualini; D B Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Quantitation of human influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes: correlation of cytotoxicity and increased numbers of IFN-gamma producing CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  S Di Fabio; I N Mbawuike; H Kiyono; K Fujihashi; R B Couch; J R McGhee
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.823

8.  Immunosuppression in vivo by a soluble form of the CTLA-4 T cell activation molecule.

Authors:  P S Linsley; P M Wallace; J Johnson; M G Gibson; J L Greene; J A Ledbetter; C Singh; M A Tepper
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Functional and ontogenetic analysis of murine CD45Rhi and CD45Rlo CD4+ T cells.

Authors:  W T Lee; X M Yin; E S Vitetta
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Naive versus memory CD4 T cell response to antigen. Memory cells are less dependent on accessory cell costimulation and can respond to many antigen-presenting cell types including resting B cells.

Authors:  M Croft; L M Bradley; S L Swain
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Generation, persistence and plasticity of CD4 T-cell memories.

Authors:  Jason R Lees; Donna L Farber
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 2.  A spatial view of the CD8+ T-cell response: the case of HCV.

Authors:  Vito Racanelli; Patrizia Leone; Arash Grakoui
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.989

3.  Memory CD4 T cells direct protective responses to influenza virus in the lungs through helper-independent mechanisms.

Authors:  John R Teijaro; David Verhoeven; Carly A Page; Damian Turner; Donna L Farber
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Divergent mucosal and systemic responses in children in response to acute otitis media.

Authors:  D Verhoeven; M E Pichichero
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Ki-67 expression reveals strong, transient influenza specific CD4 T cell responses after adult vaccination.

Authors:  Xi Li; Hongyu Miao; Alicia Henn; David J Topham; Hulin Wu; Martin S Zand; Tim R Mosmann
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Multiple genetic programs contribute to CD4 T cell memory differentiation and longevity by maintaining T cell quiescence.

Authors:  Nianbin Song; Srona Sengupta; Stanislav Khoruzhenko; Robin A Welsh; AeRyon Kim; Mithra R Kumar; Søren Ulrik Sønder; John-William Sidhom; Hao Zhang; Chunfa Jie; Robert F Siliciano; Scheherazade Sadegh-Nasseri
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.868

7.  Early IFN-gamma production after YF 17D vaccine virus immunization in mice and its association with adaptive immune responses.

Authors:  Patrícia C C Neves; Juliana R Santos; Luciana N Tubarão; Myrna C Bonaldo; Ricardo Galler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.