Literature DB >> 18476201

Cefotetan susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria from obstetrical and gynecologic sources: comparison of five different methods.

M Maccato1, G Riddle, S Faro.   

Abstract

Five different antibiotic susceptibility methods were utilized to test the effectiveness of cefotetan against 200 anaerobic bacteria recovered from patients with obstetrical or gynecological infections. The object of this study was to determine if a more economical and rapid method for anaerobic susceptibility testing was as acceptable as the reference agar dilution method. The five methods were: 1) broth disk elution, 2) microbroth technique, 3) a commercially available microbroth technique, 4) a commercially available spiral gradient technique, and 5) reference agar dilution. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) calculated from the spiral gradient technique were equal to or within one doubling dilution of the reference system in 99.5% of cases, while the percentage for the commercially available microbroth system was 96.8%, very similar to the microbroth technique used in our laboratory that yielded a percentage of 96.3. The disk elution method correlated to the reference agar dilution method in 95.3% cases. While the overall agreement between these techniques is good, especially for the spiral gradient system, clustering of certain organisms near the breakpoint of the antibiotic tested results in variability in the labeling of these organisms as susceptible or resistant. This problem appears to be particularly significant for the disk elution method. Therefore, further refinements in these methods of suscleptibility testing are needed in order to provide a more clinically useful assessment of the susceptibility or resistance of certain bacterial isolates.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 18476201      PMCID: PMC2364666          DOI: 10.1155/S1064744993000067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1064-7449


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of spiral gradient and conventional agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; E Molitoris; F Jashnian; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Perspectives on the bacteriology of postoperative obstetric-gynecologic infections.

Authors:  S Faro; L E Phillips; M G Martens
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A multicenter study of the in vitro antianaerobic activity of cefotetan compared with other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R J Zabransky; D G Bobey; W Sheikh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Comparison of susceptibility results of anaerobic organisms determined by agar dilution method and Sceptor Anaerobe MIC/ID Micro Broth Dilution Panels.

Authors:  Z Hussain; R Lannigan; B C Schieven; L Stoakes; D Groves
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  In vitro activity of selected antibiotics against anaerobes.

Authors:  H M Wexler; S M Finegold
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 6.  Controversies in susceptibility testing of anaerobes.

Authors:  K E Aldridge
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 7.  Cefotetan: a review of the microbiologic properties and antimicrobial spectrum.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of results from three NCCLS methods and quality control recommendations for the reference agar dilution procedure.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Allen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.803

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.