Literature DB >> 18475101

Pyloric stenosis: from a retrospective analysis to a prospective clinical trial - the impact on surgical outcomes.

Shawn D St Peter1, Daniel J Ostlie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pyloric stenosis is the most common surgical condition of infants. The operative approach, however, is currently debated in the literature following the application of laparoscopic and circumumbilical techniques to facilitate the pyloromyotomy. In this review, we will examine the published data and critically evaluate the influence of prospective data in delineating truths and illuminating flaws of retrospective data on a controversial topic. RECENT
FINDINGS: Retrospective data are highly discordant on the influence an operative approach for pyloromyotomy has on operating time, time to goal feeds, length of stay and complications. Prospective randomized data demonstrate that when the postoperative management is controlled, the approach does not influence length of recovery in a clinically relevant manner. Prospective data also demonstrate that the operating time can be the same for the laparoscopic and open approaches with no differences in complications for centers with good laparoscopic volume. There are no prospective data to contrast the circumumbilical approach with the other approaches; however there is an inherent and obvious cosmetic advantage to the laparoscopic and circumumbilical approaches, which avoid a large epigastric incision.
SUMMARY: The laparoscopic approach does not appear to influence length of recovery compared to the open operation. Prospective data show the laparoscopic approach results in less postoperative pain and can be done with no increase in operating time or complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18475101     DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282ff0de9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr        ISSN: 1040-8703            Impact factor:   2.856


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of a novel technique of the microlaparoscopic pyloromyotomy to circumbilical and Weber-Ramstedt approaches.

Authors:  Salmai Turial; Jan Enders; Felix Schier; Mariana Santos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Microlaparoscopic pyloromyotomy in children: initial experiences with a new technique.

Authors:  Salmai Turial; Jan Enders; Felix Schier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  M W N Oomen; L T Hoekstra; R Bakx; H A Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a survey of 407 children.

Authors:  Aurélien Binet; C Klipfel; P Meignan; F Bastard; A R Cook; K Braïk; A Le Touze; T Villemagne; M Robert; Q Ballouhey; F Lengelle; S Amar; H Lardy
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications.

Authors:  M W N Oomen; L T Hoekstra; R Bakx; D T Ubbink; H A Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Acetaminophen for analgesia following pyloromyotomy: does the route of administration make a difference?

Authors:  Arvid Yung; Arlyne Thung; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.