Literature DB >> 18474918

Contribution of early failure to outcome on peritoneal dialysis.

Bernard Descoeudres1, Michael T Koller, Daniela Garzoni, Thomas Wolff, Juerg Steiger, Stefan Schaub, Michael Mayr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The technique failure rate on peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains high despite technical progress. There are no data concerning the contribution of early failure to outcome on PD. AIM: To analyze the importance of early treatment failure in PD and to compare early with late failures with respect to reasons and predictors of risk for failure.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients admitted for PD from October 1983 to June 2005. The end point was PD failure-free survival. Differences between reasons for failure with respect to early (within 6 months) and late failure were analyzed. Multivariate associations of baseline covariates with early and late failure were investigated.
RESULTS: We included 279 patients. 153 (55%) patients experienced PD failure: 97 (63%) of them had technique failure; 56 (37%) patients died due to non-PD-related causes. 29% (n = 44) of all PD failures and 40% (n = 39) of all technique failures occurred within 6 months. Catheter and psychosocial problems contributed more often to early than to late failure, whereas infections, leakages, and hernias contributed equally to early and late failure. Death was the predominant reason for late failure. Female sex was a risk factor for early failure and older age a risk factor for late failure. Higher cholesterol levels were associated with a decreased risk for both early and late failure.
CONCLUSION: The contribution of early failure to outcome on PD is important, as one third of all PD failures and 40% of all technique failures may occur within the first 6 months, as shown in our study. Due to the retrospective nature and the single-center character, the results cannot be generalized. However, it is important to enhance recognition of patients at high risk for early PD failure prior to initiation of PD, in order to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions and medical complications, and for rational resource allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18474918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  12 in total

1.  Predictors and outcomes of transfers from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis.

Authors:  Patrick G Lan; Philip A Clayton; John Saunders; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Paul L Snelling
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Kenneth Story; Steven Guest; Michelle Fedunyszyn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  High body mass index is a risk factor for transition to hemodialysis or hybrid therapy and peritoneal dialysis-related infection in Japanese patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Eriko Yoshida Hama; Kiyotaka Uchiyama; Tomoki Nagasaka; Ei Kusahana; Takashin Nakayama; Itaru Yasuda; Kohkichi Morimoto; Naoki Washida; Hiroshi Itoh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The Association of Effluent Ca125 with Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Failure.

Authors:  Deirisa Lopes Barreto; Tiny Hoekstra; Nynke Halbesma; Martijn Leegte; Elisabeth W Boeschoten; Friedo W Dekker; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Is transition between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis really a gradual process?

Authors:  Lucie Boissinot; Isabelle Landru; Eric Cardineau; Elie Zagdoun; Jean-Philippe Ryckelycnk; Thierry Lobbedez
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Relationship between Kt/V urea-based dialysis adequacy and nutritional status and their effect on the components of the quality of life in incident peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jin-Bor Chen; King-Kwan Lam; Yu-Jen Su; Wen-Chin Lee; Ben-Chung Cheng; Chien-Chun Kuo; Chien-Hsing Wu; Eton Lin; Yi-Chun Wang; Te-Chuan Chen; Shang-Chih Liao
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Very early withdrawal from treatment in patients starting peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Qimei Luo; Xi Xia; Zhenchuan Lin; Jianxiong Lin; Xiao Yang; Fengxian Huang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

8.  Analysis of outcome and factors correlated with maintenance peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Min Li; Jin Yan; Hao Zhang; Qiongying Wu; Jianwen Wang; Jishi Liu; Chengling Xing; Yuqiong Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Time-averaged serum potassium levels and its fluctuation associate with 5-year survival of peritoneal dialysis patients: two-center based study.

Authors:  Shen-Heng Li; Jian-Teng Xie; Hai-Bo Long; Jun Zhang; Wei-Dong Zhou; Hong-Xin Niu; Xun Tang; Zhong-Lin Feng; Zhi-Ming Ye; Yang-Yang Zuo; Lei Fu; Feng Wen; Li-Ping Wang; Wen-Jian Wang; Wei Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Technique failure in Korean incident peritoneal dialysis patients: a national population-based study.

Authors:  Shina Lee; Hyunwook Kim; Kyoung Hoon Kim; Hoo Jae Hann; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Seung-Jung Kim; Duk-Hee Kang; Kyu Bok Choi; Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.