OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine differential functional MRI patterns in those at genetic risk for Alzheimer disease (AD), specifically investigating parietal lobe activation, a brain region with changes noted in the early stages of AD. METHODS: This study uses functional MRI to investigate blood oxygenation level dependent changes in the parietal lobe in a high-risk sample of 18 asymptomatic offspring of autopsy-confirmed AD cases, compared to 15 matched controls. The cognitive activation paradigm was a mental rotation task, which requires individuals to rotate three-dimensional cube stimuli to judge their similarity. RESULTS: We found no differences in either reaction time or performance accuracy between groups. However, the at-risk individuals showed increases in activation in the right superior parietal lobule (BA 7), the right insula (BA 13), the right middle frontal gyrus (BA 10), and the right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47). CONCLUSIONS: We present evidence for a compensatory mechanism for those at increased risk for Alzheimer disease (AD). This study examines and confirms parietal changes with increased risk for late-onset AD, despite normal cognitive performance. Added to the previous findings from this group, these results demonstrate the sensitivity of functional imaging measures to brain changes that are not yet reflected in cognitive performance, which may ultimately serve as an important indicator of disease.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine differential functional MRI patterns in those at genetic risk for Alzheimer disease (AD), specifically investigating parietal lobe activation, a brain region with changes noted in the early stages of AD. METHODS: This study uses functional MRI to investigate blood oxygenation level dependent changes in the parietal lobe in a high-risk sample of 18 asymptomatic offspring of autopsy-confirmed AD cases, compared to 15 matched controls. The cognitive activation paradigm was a mental rotation task, which requires individuals to rotate three-dimensional cube stimuli to judge their similarity. RESULTS: We found no differences in either reaction time or performance accuracy between groups. However, the at-risk individuals showed increases in activation in the right superior parietal lobule (BA 7), the right insula (BA 13), the right middle frontal gyrus (BA 10), and the right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47). CONCLUSIONS: We present evidence for a compensatory mechanism for those at increased risk for Alzheimer disease (AD). This study examines and confirms parietal changes with increased risk for late-onset AD, despite normal cognitive performance. Added to the previous findings from this group, these results demonstrate the sensitivity of functional imaging measures to brain changes that are not yet reflected in cognitive performance, which may ultimately serve as an important indicator of disease.
Authors: W Richter; R Somorjai; R Summers; M Jarmasz; R S Menon; J S Gati; A P Georgopoulos; C Tegeler; K Ugurbil; S G Kim Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: P Pietrini; M L Furey; G E Alexander; M J Mentis; A Dani; M Guazzelli; S I Rapoport; M B Schapiro Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: B C Dickerson; D H Salat; D N Greve; E F Chua; E Rand-Giovannetti; D M Rentz; L Bertram; K Mullin; R E Tanzi; D Blacker; M S Albert; R A Sperling Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-08-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Y Bookheimer; M H Strojwas; M S Cohen; A M Saunders; M A Pericak-Vance; J C Mazziotta; G W Small Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan Spear Bassett; Ivana Kusevic; Catherine Cristinzio; Michael A Yassa; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; David M Yousem; M Daniele Fallin Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: A Drzezga; M Riemenschneider; B Strassner; T Grimmer; M Peller; A Knoll; S Wagenpfeil; S Minoshima; M Schwaiger; A Kurz Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-01-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: John M Ringman; Luis D Medina; Meredith Braskie; Yaneth Rodriguez-Agudelo; Daniel H Geschwind; Miguel A Macias-Islas; Jeffrey L Cummings; Susan Bookheimer Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Nicole C Berchtold; Marwan N Sabbagh; Thomas G Beach; Ronald C Kim; David H Cribbs; Carl W Cotman Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Brian S Caffo; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Guillermo Verduzco; Suresh Joel; Stewart H Mostofsky; Susan Spear Bassett; James J Pekar Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 6.556