BACKGROUND: Sustained pressure overload induces pathological cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. Oxidative stress linked to nitric oxide synthase (NOS) uncoupling may play an important role. We tested whether tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) can recouple NOS and reverse preestablished advanced hypertrophy, fibrosis, and dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: C57/Bl6 mice underwent transverse aortic constriction for 4 weeks, increasing cardiac mass (190%) and diastolic dimension (144%), lowering ejection fraction (-46%), and triggering NOS uncoupling and oxidative stress. Oral BH4 was then administered for 5 more weeks of pressure overload. Without reducing loading, BH4 reversed hypertrophy and fibrosis, recoupled endothelial NOS, lowered oxidant stress, and improved chamber and myocyte function, whereas untreated hearts worsened. If BH4 was started at the onset of pressure overload, it did not suppress hypertrophy over the first week when NOS activity remained preserved even in untreated transverse aortic constriction hearts. However, BH4 stopped subsequent remodeling when NOS activity was otherwise declining. A broad antioxidant, Tempol, also reduced oxidant stress yet did not recouple NOS or reverse worsened hypertrophy/fibrosis from sustained transverse aortic constriction. Microarray analysis revealed very different gene expression profiles for both treatments. BH4 did not enhance net protein kinase G activity. Finally, transgenic mice with enhanced BH4 synthesis confined to endothelial cells were unprotected against pressure overload, indicating that exogenous BH4 targeted myocytes and fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: NOS recoupling by exogenous BH4 ameliorates preexisting advanced cardiac hypertrophy/fibrosis and is more effective than a less targeted antioxidant approach (Tempol). These data highlight the importance of myocyte NOS uncoupling in hypertrophic heart disease and support BH4 as a potential new approach to treat this disorder.
BACKGROUND: Sustained pressure overload induces pathological cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. Oxidative stress linked to nitric oxide synthase (NOS) uncoupling may play an important role. We tested whether tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) can recouple NOS and reverse preestablished advanced hypertrophy, fibrosis, and dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: C57/Bl6 mice underwent transverse aortic constriction for 4 weeks, increasing cardiac mass (190%) and diastolic dimension (144%), lowering ejection fraction (-46%), and triggering NOS uncoupling and oxidative stress. Oral BH4 was then administered for 5 more weeks of pressure overload. Without reducing loading, BH4 reversed hypertrophy and fibrosis, recoupled endothelial NOS, lowered oxidant stress, and improved chamber and myocyte function, whereas untreated hearts worsened. If BH4 was started at the onset of pressure overload, it did not suppress hypertrophy over the first week when NOS activity remained preserved even in untreated transverse aortic constriction hearts. However, BH4 stopped subsequent remodeling when NOS activity was otherwise declining. A broad antioxidant, Tempol, also reduced oxidant stress yet did not recouple NOS or reverse worsened hypertrophy/fibrosis from sustained transverse aortic constriction. Microarray analysis revealed very different gene expression profiles for both treatments. BH4 did not enhance net protein kinase G activity. Finally, transgenic mice with enhanced BH4 synthesis confined to endothelial cells were unprotected against pressure overload, indicating that exogenous BH4 targeted myocytes and fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: NOS recoupling by exogenous BH4 ameliorates preexisting advanced cardiac hypertrophy/fibrosis and is more effective than a less targeted antioxidant approach (Tempol). These data highlight the importance of myocyte NOS uncoupling in hypertrophic heart disease and support BH4 as a potential new approach to treat this disorder.
Authors: J W Knowles; G Esposito; L Mao; J R Hagaman; J E Fox; O Smithies; H A Rockman; N Maeda Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Beate Fiedler; Suzanne M Lohmann; Albert Smolenski; Stephan Linnemuller; Burkert Pieske; Frank Schroder; Jeffery D Molkentin; Helmut Drexler; Kai C Wollert Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rita Holtwick; Martin van Eickels; Boris V Skryabin; Hideo A Baba; Alexander Bubikat; Frank Begrow; Michael D Schneider; David L Garbers; Michaela Kuhn Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ulf Landmesser; Sergey Dikalov; S Russ Price; Louise McCann; Tohru Fukai; Steven M Holland; William E Mitch; David G Harrison Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Katerina Vaporidi; Roland C Francis; Kenneth D Bloch; Warren M Zapol Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Vaibhav B Patel; Abhijit Takawale; Tharmarajan Ramprasath; Subhash K Das; Ratnadeep Basu; Maria B Grant; David A Hall; Zamaneh Kassiri; Gavin Y Oudit Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Gad A Silberman; Tai-Hwang M Fan; Hong Liu; Zhe Jiao; Hong D Xiao; Joshua D Lovelock; Beth M Boulden; Julian Widder; Scott Fredd; Kenneth E Bernstein; Beata M Wolska; Sergey Dikalov; David G Harrison; Samuel C Dudley Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dirk J Duncker; Elza D van Deel; Monique C de Waard; Martine de Boer; Daphne Merkus; Jolanda van der Velden Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Olivia van Oostrom; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Joost O Fledderus; Mario Pescatori; Andrew Stubbs; Attie Tuinenburg; Sai Kiang Lim; Marianne C Verhaar Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 9.951