Literature DB >> 18474540

Comparative analysis of six different antibodies against Her2 including the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP3) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation in breast carcinomas.

C B Nunes1, R M Rocha, J S Reis-Filho, M B Lambros, G F S Rocha, F S F Sanches, F N Oliveira, H Gobbi.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 with those of mouse monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies using HER2 amplification defined by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) as the gold standard.
METHODS: Serial sections from tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 84 breast carcinomas were submitted to CISH (Zymed HER2 Spot-Light kit) and immunohistochemistry, using NeoMarkers SP3 (rabbit monoclonal), DAKO A0485 and DAKO HercepTest (polyclonal), Novocastra NCL-CB11, Cell Marque CM-CB11, and Genentech 4D5 (mouse monoclonal).
RESULTS: The best antibody concordance was between SP3 and HercepTest (kappa = 0.74). SP3, A0485 and HercepTest detected all HER2 amplified tumours, but were less specific than mouse monoclonal antibodies. 3/38 (7.9%) and 8/38 (21.0%) non-amplified tumours were scored as 3+ using SP3 and A0485, respectively. 3/46 (6.5%) amplified tumours were negative for NCL-CB11. SP3, HercepTest and A0485 showed no gene amplification on 55%, 62.5% and 92.3% of the 2+ scored tumours, but most of the 2+ scored tumours using monoclonal antibodies were amplified by CISH (80-92.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: SP3 is more sensitive than mouse monoclonal antibodies for Her2 assessment. However, HercepTest, CB11 and 4D5 show higher specificity than SP3 for the identification of HER2 gene amplification. Mouse monoclonal antibodies show less Her2 2+ tumours; most are amplified by CISH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18474540     DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2007.053892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  11 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Her-2 immunohistochemical expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas is associated with polysomy of chromosome 17, not Her-2 amplification.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papavasileiou; Konstantinos Tosios; Panos Christopoulos; Nikolaos Goutas; Dimitrios Vlachodimitropoulos
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2009-08-22

3.  Measurement of Domain-Specific HER2 (ERBB2) Expression May Classify Benefit From Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Carvajal-Hausdorf; Kurt A Schalper; Lajos Pusztai; Amanda Psyrri; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Vasiliki Kotoula; George Fountzilas; David L Rimm
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Immunohistochemical results of HER2/neu protein expression assessed by rabbit monoclonal antibodies SP3 and 4B5 in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Zhangjuan Song; Yan Deng; Kangmin Zhuang; Aimin Li; Side Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

5.  Clinicopathological variables predicting HER-2 gene status in immunohistochemistry-equivocal (2+) invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongling Ji; Liming Sheng; Xianghui Du; Guoqin Qiu; Bo Chen; Xiaojia Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach.

Authors:  Tim J A Dekker; Susan Ter Borg; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Sybren L Meijer; Jelle Wesseling; James E Boers; Ed Schuuring; Jos Bart; Joost van Gorp; Wilma E Mesker; Judith R Kroep; Vincent T H B M Smit; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  HER2 status in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas assessed by two rabbit monoclonal antibodies (SP3 and 4B5) and two in situ hybridization methods (FISH and SISH).

Authors:  James E Boers; Harriëtte Meeuwissen; Natalie Methorst
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Clinical relevance of ErbB-2/HER2 nuclear expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Roxana Schillaci; Pablo Guzmán; Florencia Cayrol; Wendy Beguelin; María C Díaz Flaqué; Cecilia J Proietti; Viviana Pineda; Jorge Palazzi; Isabel Frahm; Eduardo H Charreau; Esteban Maronna; Juan C Roa; Patricia V Elizalde
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 10.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  F E Rosa; R M Santos; S R Rogatto; M A C Domingues
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.