| Literature DB >> 18474113 |
Dennis A Grahn1, Julie Vls Murray, H Craig Heller.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many individuals afflicted with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience a transient worsening of symptoms when body temperature increases due to ambient conditions or physical activity. Resulting symptom exacerbations can limit performance. We hypothesized that extraction of heat from the body through the subcutaneous retia venosa that underlie the palmar surfaces of the hands would reduce exercise-related heat stress and thereby increase the physical performance capacity of heat-sensitive individuals with MS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18474113 PMCID: PMC2396661 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Gender, age, and diagnosis of individual subjects.
| Subject | Gender | Age | Type | Primary symptoms |
| 1 | M | 45 | RR | Leg muscle weakness, cognitive difficulties |
| 2 | M | 63 | RR | Spasticity, cognitive difficulties |
| 3 | M | 42 | RR | Fatigue, balance, cognitive difficulties |
| 4 | F | 53 | RR | Fatigue, balance, spasticity |
| 5 | M | 46 | RR | Leg motor control, balance |
| 6 | M | 55 | SP | Limb weakness |
| 7 | F | 55 | RR | Fatigue, postural muscle weakness |
| 8 | F | 55 | SP | Leg motor control |
| 9 | M | 53 | RR | Ataxic gait, cognitive difficulties |
| 10 | F | 56 | RR | Leg muscle weakness, spasticity, fatigue |
| 11 | F | 42 | RR | Vertigoa |
| 12 | F | 45 | RR | Limb weaknessa |
RR-Relapsing Remitting, SP- Secondary Progressive.
a subject withdrew from study due to self-reported relapse.
Treadmill speed and slope, number of paired trials, mean trial times and effect ratio (exercise duration with cooling/exercise duration without cooling): individual subjects and grouped data
| Subject | Speeda (Km/h) | Slopea (%) | Number of paired trials | Exercise duration (min) | Cooling effect (ratio) | |
| Control | Cooling | |||||
| 1 | 4.8 | 5 – 6 | 3 | 17.2 | 22.9 | 1.34 |
| 2 | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 1.60 |
| 3 | 4.0 | 5 – 6 | 3 | 20.7 | 22.1 | 1.07 |
| 4 | 1.3 | 0 | 1 | 25.0 | 28.3 | 1.13 |
| 5 | 3.2 – 4.8 | 6 | 4 | 36.4 | 44.8 | 1.23 |
| 6 | 4.8 | 7 – 8.5 | 3 | 37.4 | 49.8 | 1.33 |
| 7 | 4.0 | 6 – 7 | 5 | 38.4 | 51.6 | 1.34 |
| 8 | 2.4 | 0 | 2 | 39.8 | 43.2 | 1.09 |
| 9 | 3.2 | 0 | 2 | 39.9 | 67.5 | 1.69 |
| 10 | 3.2 | 5.5 – 6 | 2 | 42.3 | 65.8 | 1.55 |
| Group data b | ||||||
| Mean ± Standard Deviation | 31.7 ± 9.8 | 42.8 ± 16.4 | 1.35 ± 0.22 | |||
a Slopes and speeds of the treadmill were adjusted between sets of paired trials.
b P < 0.01, paired t-test
Figure 1The effect of hand cooling on exercise duration: a comparison of twenty-six paired treatment trials. The effect of treatment (cooling) was affected by exercise duration during the control condition. The longer the duration of exercise in the control condition, the greater the cooling treatment effect. An exponential function (y = 12.505e0.0356x) accounted for 90% of the variance in the data. The solid line was generated by the exponential function; the dashed line represents unity. Inset: mean ± SD exercise duration with treatment and without treatment (43.6 ± 17.09 min. with treatment vs. 32.8 ± 10.9 min. without treatment (p < 5.0·10-6, two tailed paired t-test, n = 26).
Figure 2The effect of cooling on heart rate during exercise. Examples of heart rates during paired control and experimental trials from 4 subjects. Open symbols control, closed symbols cooling. While treatment (cooling) had little effect on heart rate, there were substantial differences between individual subject heart rates. This inter subject variability in heart rate was due in part to differences in work loads among subjects.