Literature DB >> 18473590

In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans and C. neoformans var. gattii.

C De Bedout1, N Ordóñez, B L Gómez, M C Rodríguez, M Arango, A Restrepo, E Castañeda.   

Abstract

One of the differences observed between the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformansis the greater difficulty to achieve an adequate therapeutical response in patients affected by C. neoformans var. gattii, an observation that has been validated in vitro only rarely. The aim of this work was to study the susceptibility patterns of 35 Colombian clinical isolates of C. neoformans, 20 of which belonged to the var. neoformans and 15 to the var. gattii. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution, according to a modification of the methodology proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), using the breakpoints recently suggested by Nguyen et al. (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 471-472). The antifungals tested were amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole. Most of the isolates were susceptible to the three antimycotics tested regardless of the variety. Resistance to amphotericin B (MIC=2 microg/ml) was documented in two (10%) C. neoformans var. neoformans isolates; additionally, five (33%) C. neoformans var. gattii isolates felt in the category of fluconazole susceptible but dose dependent (MIC 16 microg/ml). In general, all C. neoformans var. gattii isolates proved susceptible only to the higher concentrations of the antifungals tested. For amphotericin B, seven (47%) isolates of this variety had MICs of 1 microg/ml, for fluconazole there were seven (47%) with MICs of 8 microg/ml and in the case of itraconazole, 10 isolates (66%) had MICs > 0.03 microg/ml. The data showed that although these isolates would be classified as susceptible, they actually require greater concentrations of the antifungals to be inhibited. This finding may well correlate both with the difficulty to attain therapeutic success in patients affected with C. neoformans var. gattii and with the need for more prolonged treatment courses in such cases.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 18473590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Iberoam Micol        ISSN: 1130-1406            Impact factor:   1.044


  4 in total

1.  Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for amphotericin B and flucytosine.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; A Chowdhary; M Cuenca-Estrella; A Fothergill; J Fuller; F Hagen; N Govender; J Guarro; E Johnson; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; M A Martins; J F Meis; M S C Melhem; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; M A Pfaller; W A Schell; L Trilles; S Kidd; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro susceptibility of the yeast pathogen cryptococcus to fluconazole and other azoles varies with molecular genotype.

Authors:  Hin Siong Chong; Rebecca Dagg; Richard Malik; Sharon Chen; Dee Carter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Correlation of genotype and in vitro susceptibilities of Cryptococcus gattii strains from the Pacific Northwest of the United States.

Authors:  Naureen Iqbal; Emilio E DeBess; Ron Wohrle; Ben Sun; Randall J Nett; Angela M Ahlquist; Tom Chiller; Shawn R Lockhart
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; A I Aller; E Canton; L R Castañón-Olivares; A Chowdhary; S Cordoba; M Cuenca-Estrella; A Fothergill; J Fuller; N Govender; F Hagen; M T Illnait-Zaragozi; E Johnson; S Kidd; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; M A Martins; J F Meis; M S C Melhem; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; M A Pfaller; W A Schell; G St-Germain; L Trilles; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.