Literature DB >> 18473370

Functional morphology of the feeding apparatus, feeding constraints, and suction performance in the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum.

Philip J Motta1, Robert E Hueter, Timothy C Tricas, Adam P Summers, Daniel R Huber, Dayv Lowry, Kyle R Mara, Michael P Matott, Lisa B Whitenack, Alpa P Wintzer.   

Abstract

The nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum, is an obligate suction feeder that preys on benthic invertebrates and fish. Its cranial morphology exhibits a suite of structural and functional modifications that facilitate this mode of prey capture. During suction-feeding, subambient pressure is generated by the ventral expansion of the hyoid apparatus and the floor of its buccopharyngeal cavity. As in suction-feeding bony fishes, the nurse shark exhibits expansive, compressive, and recovery kinematic phases that produce posterior-directed water flow through the buccopharyngeal cavity. However, there is generally neither a preparatory phase nor cranial elevation. Suction is generated by the rapid depression of the buccopharyngeal floor by the coracoarcualis, coracohyoideus, and coracobranchiales muscles. Because the hyoid arch of G. cirratum is loosely connected to the mandible, contraction of the rectus cervicis muscle group can greatly depress the floor of the buccopharyngeal cavity below the depressed mandible, resulting in large volumetric expansion. Suction pressures in the nurse shark vary greatly, but include the greatest subambient pressures reported for an aquatic-feeding vertebrate. Maximum suction pressure does not appear to be related to shark size, but is correlated with the rate of buccopharyngeal expansion. As in suction-feeding bony fishes, suction in the nurse shark is only effective within approximately 3 cm in front of the mouth. The foraging behavior of this shark is most likely constrained to ambushing or stalking due to the exponential decay of effective suction in front of the mouth. Prey capture may be facilitated by foraging within reef confines and close to the substrate, which can enhance the effective suction distance, or by foraging at night when it can more closely approach prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18473370     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  6 in total

1.  Dual function of the pectoral girdle for feeding and locomotion in white-spotted bamboo sharks.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Bradley Scott; Elizabeth L Brainerd; Cheryl D Wilga
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cranial morphology of the orectolobiform shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum Müller & Henle, 1838.

Authors:  Manuel Andreas Staggl; Daniel Abed-Navandi; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  Vertebr Zool       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.879

3.  X-ray computed tomography library of shark anatomy and lower jaw surface models.

Authors:  Pepijn Kamminga; Paul W De Bruin; Jacob Geleijns; Martin D Brazeau
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 6.444

4.  High-performance suction feeding in an early elasmobranch.

Authors:  Michael I Coates; Kristen Tietjen; Aaron M Olsen; John A Finarelli
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Absence of suction feeding ichthyosaurs and its implications for triassic mesopelagic paleoecology.

Authors:  Ryosuke Motani; Cheng Ji; Taketeru Tomita; Neil Kelley; Erin Maxwell; Da-yong Jiang; Paul Martin Sander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.