Literature DB >> 18473027

Relative impact of patient characteristics and radiographic variables on the difficulty of removing impacted mandibular third molars.

Oladimeji A Akadiri1, Ambrose E Obiechina, Juwon T Arotiba, Abiodun O Fasola.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the relative contributions of patient characteristics and radiographic variables to the difficulty of extraction of impacted mandibular third molars in a Nigerian population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-nine consecutive patients undergoing mandibular third molar extractions were recruited for this prospective cohort study. Specific patient characteristics and radiographic variables were recorded. All extractions were performed under local anesthesia by the same oral surgeon, and the surgical difficulty was assessed based on the duration of surgery.
RESULTS: Body weight (BW) (P=0.009) and body surface area (BSA) (P=0.004) were the significant patient characteristics while tooth impaction depth (P=0.002), number of roots (P=0.035), and tooth angulation (P=0.003) were the significant radiographic variables associated with surgical difficulty using a univariate analysis. A multiple linear regression model was constructed with these variables using surgical difficulty as the dependent variable. Radiographic factors were found to be the more important determinants of surgical difficulty with the depth of impaction (P=0.038) being the singular most important factor.
CONCLUSION: Although the difficulty of surgical removal of impacted lower third molars is dependent on BW, BSA, impaction depth, tooth angulation, and the number of roots, radiographic variables were of greater importance with impaction depth being the most important single factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18473027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  5 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars?

Authors:  Kyeong-Lok Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-25

3.  Correlation between Body Mass Index and the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications after Surgical Removal of the Lower Third Molar.

Authors:  Magdalena Coga; Daniel Jerkovic; Lidia Gavic; Antonija Tadin; Kristian Jerkovic; Darko Macan
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2022-03

4.  Assessment and determination of human mandibular and dental arch profiles in subjects with lower third molar impaction in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Authors:  Akinbami Babatunde Olayemi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07

5.  Role of patients' demographic characteristics and spatial orientation in predicting operative difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar.

Authors:  Os Obimakinde; Vn Okoje; Olabode A Ijarogbe; Am Obimakinde
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.