Literature DB >> 18472335

Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.

Samuel R Atcherson1, Marni Johnson Martin, Rachel Lintvedt.   

Abstract

Contralateral acoustic stimulation has been shown to produce a suppressive effect on the 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE). According to reports by other studies, there is a frequency-specific suppressive region between 1 and 2kHz when the contralateral broadband or narrowband noise stimulation contains energy close to or near the F2 frequencies in that region. In general the broader the bandwidth of the noise stimulation, the greater is the suppressive effect. A frequency-sensitive region between 1 and 2kHz has also been suggested as narrowband noises with center frequencies remote from the F2 frequency seems to produce suppression in the same defined region. In order to test this hypothesis, narrowband noises wide enough to elicit suppression with center frequencies unmatched to the F2 frequencies were employed in the present study. For the right ear, a strong frequency-sensitive suppressive region was noted for the F2 frequency at 2kHz, but not at 1 and 4kHz. The left ear had some suppression at 1kHz, but this effect was not as robust as seen in the right ear. The apparent suppressive differences between ears suggest a possible MOC reflex asymmetry that has not previously been described for DPOAEs. These results suggest that physiological differences between ears and possibly handedness must be taken into account when examining contralateral suppression to narrowband noises. Furthermore, the frequency contributions of the contralateral stimulus may have a greater complex interaction with the cochlear physiology than previously considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18472335     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

Review 2.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: input-output functions in neonates.

Authors:  Ualace de Paula Campos; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Krzysztof Kochanek; Lech Sliwa; Henryk Skarzynski; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-10

4.  Contralateral efferent suppression of human hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15

5.  The Effect of Primary Levels and Frequencies on the Contralateral Suppression of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission.

Authors:  Natalia Yakunina; Jinsook Kim; Eui-Cheol Nam
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-01-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.