Literature DB >> 18472183

Out-of-hospital combat casualty care in the current war in Iraq.

Robert T Gerhardt1, Robert A De Lorenzo, Jeffrey Oliver, John B Holcomb, James A Pfaff.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We describe outcomes for battle casualties receiving initial treatment at a US Army consolidated battalion aid station augmented with emergency medicine practitioners, advanced medic treatment protocols, and active medical direction. Battalion aid stations are mobile facilities integral to combat units, providing initial phases of advanced trauma life support and then evacuation. The setting was a forward base in central Iraq, with units engaged in urban combat operations.
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Rates of battle casualties, mechanism, evacuations, and outcome were calculated. Corresponding Iraqi theater-wide US casualty rates were also calculated for indirect comparison.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1.1% of the total US military population in the Iraqi theater. Data were available for all battle casualties. The study facility's battle casualty rate was 22.2%. The case fatality rate was 7.14%, and the out-of-theater evacuation rate was 27%. Analysis of evacuated patients revealed a study average Injury Severity Score of 10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8 to 12). Concurrent theater aggregate US casualty rates are provided for contextual reference and include battle casualty rate of 6.7%, case fatality rate of 10.45%, out-of-theater evacuation rate of 18%, and average out-of-theater evacuation casualty Injury Severity Score of 10 (95% CI 9.5 to 10.5).
CONCLUSION: The study battalion aid station experienced high casualty and evacuation rates while also demonstrating relatively low case fatality rates. A relatively high proportion of patients were evacuated out of the combat zone, reflecting both the battle casualty rate and number of patients surviving. Future effort should focus on improving out-of-hospital combat casualty data collection and prospective validation of emergency medicine-based out-of-hospital battlefield care and medical direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18472183     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Combat Casualty Care.

Authors:  R Katoch
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  The efficacy and value of emergency medicine: a supportive literature review.

Authors:  C James Holliman; Terrence M Mulligan; Robert E Suter; Peter Cameron; Lee Wallis; Philip D Anderson; Kathleen Clem
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-22

3.  An original design of remote robot-assisted intubation system.

Authors:  Xinyu Wang; Yuanfa Tao; Xiandong Tao; Jianglong Chen; Yifeng Jin; Zhengxiang Shan; Jiyang Tan; Qixin Cao; Tiewen Pan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Optimization of the Casualties' Treatment Process: Blended Military Experiment.

Authors:  Jan Hodický; Dalibor Procházka; Roman Jersák; Petr Stodola; Jan Drozd
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  Blast injuries and heterotopic ossification.

Authors:  K A Alfieri; J A Forsberg; B K Potter
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 6.  Emergency Physicians at War.

Authors:  Andrew E Muck; Melissa Givens; Vikhyat S Bebarta; Phillip E Mason; Craig Goolsby
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.