Literature DB >> 18471679

Evaluation of Wells score and repeated D-dimer in diagnosing venous thromboembolism.

Maria Ljungqvist1, Mårten Söderberg, Per Moritz, Anders Ahlgren, Gerd Lärfars.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of venous thromboembolism (VTE), i.e., deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), are common at the emergency departments. However, of those, only 15-25% actually have the disease. The aims of this study were to determine (1) if low pre-test probability (PTP) using the Wells score, together with a normal D-dimer, safely excludes VTE in outpatients and (2) if a follow-up D-dimer adds extra information.
METHODS: Patients (n=151, 68% women) with suspected VTE, a PTP below 1.5, and a D-dimer test (TinaQuant) below 0.5 mg/L were included in the study and underwent no further diagnostic investigations. Patients (n=177, 54% women) with D-dimer levels of 0.5 mg/L or higher or a PTP of 1.5 or higher were excluded. A follow-up D-dimer test was conducted 3-7 days after the initial hospital visit and further diagnostic investigations were made if test results were abnormal. Patients were studied for 3 months.
RESULTS: A follow-up D-dimer test was conducted in 101/151 cases (67%), 13/101 of which revealed elevated D-dimer levels. None of these 13 patients had persistent symptoms or was diagnosed with VTE. All 151 patients were contacted after 3 months; none of them had clinical signs of VTE. Of the 177 patients excluded, 45 (25%) were diagnosed with VTE. Of the 176/328 (151+177) patients with normal D-dimer levels, only 1 had VTE (<0.01%).
CONCLUSION: A normal PTP using the Wells score and a normal D-dimer safely excludes VTE at the emergency department. A follow-up D-dimer test adds no further information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471679     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  10 in total

1.  EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT.

Authors:  M Bajc; J B Neilly; M Miniati; C Schuemichen; M Meignan; B Jonson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  [Chest pain in the emergency department : Differential diagnosis and diagnostic strategy].

Authors:  T Köhnlein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  The predictive value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio and D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio combined with WELLS score on lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in young patients with cerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Huijun Wen; Yingcong Chen
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Joint Guideline on Venous Thromboembolism - 2022.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker; Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire; Simone Nascimento Dos Santos; Monica Luiza de Alcantara; Mohamed Hassan Saleh; Armando Luis Cantisano; José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro; Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto; Salomon Israel do Amaral; Orlando Carlos Gloria Veloso; Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco; Fanilda Souto Barros; Márcio Vinícius Lins de Barros; Adriano José de Souza; Marcone Lima Sobreira; Robson Barbosa de Miranda; Domingos de Moraes; Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro; Alexandre Dias Mançano; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Cristina Sebastião Matushita; Rafael Willain Lopes; Artur Martins Novaes Coutinho; Diego Bromfman Pianta; Alair Augusto Sarmet Moreira Damas Dos Santos; Bruno de Lima Naves; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 5.  Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT.

Authors:  John H Reid; Emmanuel E Coche; Tomio Inoue; Edmund E Kim; Maurizio Dondi; Naoyuki Watanabe; Giuliano Mariani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Cutoff values of plasma d-dimer level in patients with diagnosis of the venous thromboembolism after elective spinal surgery.

Authors:  Saeed Hamidi; Mahdieh Riazi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  [Cost-effectiveness of the deep vein thrombosis diagnosis process in primary care].

Authors:  Eva Fuentes Camps; José Luis del Val García; Sergi Bellmunt Montoya; Sara Hmimina Hmimina; Efren Gómez Jabalera; Miguel Ángel Muñoz Pérez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 8.  Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update.

Authors:  Swaroopa Pulivarthi; Murali Krishna Gurram
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-10

9.  Ruling out Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with High Pretest Probability.

Authors:  Murtaza Akhter; Jeffrey Kline; Bikash Bhattarai; Mark Courtney; Christopher Kabrhel
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-08

10.  Risk factors, risk assessment, and prognosis in patients with gynecological cancer and thromboembolism.

Authors:  Xindan Wang; Jing Huang; Zhao Bingbing; Shape Li; Li Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 1.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.