Literature DB >> 18471658

Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity.

Stefania I Papatheodorou1, Thomas A Trikalinos, John P A Ioannidis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in and determinants of the number of authors in clinical studies. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We analyzed determinants of the number of authors in 633 articles of randomized trials and 313 articles of nonrandomized studies included in large meta-analyses (seven and six topics, respectively). Analyses were adjusted for topic. We also evaluated 310 randomly sampled case reports that had an abstract and described a single case.
RESULTS: After adjusting for topic and other determinants, for both randomized trials and nonrandomized studies, the number of authors increased by 0.8 per decade (P<0.001). Topic was a strong determinant of the number of authors; other independent factors included journal impact factor, multinational authorship, and (for randomized trials) article length and sample size. Trials from South Europe (+1.1 authors) and North America (+0.9) and nonrandomized studies from South Europe (+1.8) had more authors than studies from North Europe (P<0.001). For case reports, only geographic location and article length were significantly related with author numbers.
CONCLUSION: The number of authors in articles of randomized and nonrandomized studies has increased over time, even after adjusting for the topic, size, and visibility of a study. The academic coinage of authorship may be suffering from inflation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471658     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  20 in total

1.  Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends.

Authors:  Robert J McDonald; Kevin L Neff; Melissa L Rethlefsen; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research.

Authors:  Anthony Bowen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ethics of using language editing services in an era of digital communication and heavily multi-authored papers.

Authors:  George A Lozano
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Richard Klavans; Kevin W Boyack
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Level of evidence and authorship trends of clinical studies in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 1995-2015.

Authors:  Ryan P Judy; Jason J Shin; Christopher McCrum; Olufemi R Ayeni; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication.

Authors:  Mohammad Hosseini; Jonathan Lewis; Hub Zwart; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.777

7.  Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history.

Authors:  Faisal Khan; Morgan M Sandelski; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; Jennifer Lamb; Christina Pedro; Michael B N Adjei; Shatoria Lunsford; James P Fischer; Austin E Wininger; Elizabeth C Whipple; Randall T Loder; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Ten Years of Sports Health: Authorship Characteristics and Levels of Evidence.

Authors:  Ryan P Judy; Spencer Talentino; Asheesh Bedi; Bryson P Lesniak
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs.

Authors:  Liz Allen; Ceri Jones; Kevin Dolby; David Lynn; Mark Walport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.