Literature DB >> 18471645

Role of cavitation in the phacoemulsification process.

Jaime Zacharias1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the role of cavitational energy as a mechanism responsible for the emulsification of the lens during phacoemulsification.
SETTING: Clinica Ophthalmologica Pasteur, Santiago, Chile.
METHODS: Cavitation and its relationship to phacoemulsification power were documented using a combination of light sources, high-speed video recording techniques, and computerized control and by monitoring environmental pressure. The suppression of cavitation from the phaco process was achieved by building an environmental hyperbaric system capable of retaining the phacoemulsification system's ability to provide irrigation, aspiration, and vacuum necessary at standard and elevated pressures. The pressure level was controlled and monitored through a computer interface alongside the simultaneous video monitoring of cavitation bubble creation changes during pressure rise or fall. Last, evaluation and measurement of phacoemulsification was performed on real cataract fragments in the presence and absence of cavitation.
RESULTS: Cavitation around the phaco tip mainly occurred at longitudinal ultrasonic power levels of 30% or more. Cavitation bubble formation was observed during the backstroke or as the tip moved away from the lens material and collapsed during the forward displacement of the phaco tip. Cavitation at any power level was successfully suppressed when the pressure in the hyperbaric chamber increased beyond 2.0 bar (29.1 psi) above atmospheric pressure. Phacoemulsification performance in the presence or absence of cavitation was comparable.
CONCLUSION: This study found strong evidence that cavitation plays no role in phacoemulsification, leaving the jackhammer effect as the only important mechanism responsible for the lens-disrupting power of phacoemulsification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471645     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of early results of quick-chop phacoemulsification in the patients with high myopic cataract.

Authors:  Ali Akal; Tugba Goncu; Sevin Soker Cakmak; Isa Yuvaci; Mustafa Atas; Süleyman Demircan; Omer Faruk Yilmaz
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  An evaluation of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of torsional mode versus longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pia Leon; Ingrid Umari; Alessandro Mangogna; Andrea Zanei; Daniele Tognetto
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Kim; Won-Ryang Wee; Jin-Hak Lee; Mee-Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-23

4.  Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract.

Authors:  Mohamed A Fakhry; Malak I El Shazly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-15

5.  Wound and surface temperatures in vivo in torsional and longitudinal modalities of ultrasound in coaxial microincisional cataract surgery.

Authors:  Swapna Nair; Ramachandran Unnikrishnan Nair
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-27

6.  Post-phacoemulsification iris changes in eyes with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect status.

Authors:  Qinyun Wang; Claudio I Perez; Marissé Masis; Max Feinstein; Marta Mora; Shan C Lin; Yen C Hsia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of increasing power when grooving using phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Rhett S Thomson; Brian A Bird; Lance A Stutz; Joshua B Heczko; Ashlie A Bernhisel; William R Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.