BACKGROUND: Polypodium hydriforme is a parasite with an unusual life cycle and peculiar morphology, both of which have made its systematic position uncertain. Polypodium has traditionally been considered a cnidarian because it possesses nematocysts, the stinging structures characteristic of this phylum. However, recent molecular phylogenetic studies using 18S rDNA sequence data have challenged this interpretation, and have shown that Polypodium is a close relative to myxozoans and together they share a closer affinity to bilaterians than cnidarians. Due to the variable rates of 18S rDNA sequences, these results have been suggested to be an artifact of long-branch attraction (LBA). A recent study, using multiple protein coding markers, shows that the myxozoan Buddenbrockia, is nested within cnidarians. Polypodium was not included in this study. To further investigate the phylogenetic placement of Polypodium, we have performed phylogenetic analyses of metazoans with 18S and partial 28S rDNA sequences in a large dataset that includes Polypodium and a comprehensive sampling of cnidarian taxa. RESULTS: Analyses of a combined dataset of 18S and partial 28S sequences, and partial 28S alone, support the placement of Polypodium within Cnidaria. Removal of the long-branched myxozoans from the 18S dataset also results in Polypodium being nested within Cnidaria. These results suggest that previous reports showing that Polypodium and Myxozoa form a sister group to Bilateria were an artifact of long-branch attraction. CONCLUSION: By including 28S rDNA sequences and a comprehensive sampling of cnidarian taxa, we demonstrate that previously conflicting hypotheses concerning the phylogenetic placement of Polypodium can be reconciled. Specifically, the data presented provide evidence that Polypodium is indeed a cnidarian and is either the sister taxon to Hydrozoa, or part of the hydrozoan clade, Leptothecata. The former hypothesis is consistent with the traditional view that Polypodium should be placed in its own cnidarian class, Polypodiozoa.
BACKGROUND:Polypodium hydriforme is a parasite with an unusual life cycle and peculiar morphology, both of which have made its systematic position uncertain. Polypodium has traditionally been considered a cnidarian because it possesses nematocysts, the stinging structures characteristic of this phylum. However, recent molecular phylogenetic studies using 18S rDNA sequence data have challenged this interpretation, and have shown that Polypodium is a close relative to myxozoans and together they share a closer affinity to bilaterians than cnidarians. Due to the variable rates of 18S rDNA sequences, these results have been suggested to be an artifact of long-branch attraction (LBA). A recent study, using multiple protein coding markers, shows that the myxozoan Buddenbrockia, is nested within cnidarians. Polypodium was not included in this study. To further investigate the phylogenetic placement of Polypodium, we have performed phylogenetic analyses of metazoans with 18S and partial 28S rDNA sequences in a large dataset that includes Polypodium and a comprehensive sampling of cnidarian taxa. RESULTS: Analyses of a combined dataset of 18S and partial 28S sequences, and partial 28S alone, support the placement of Polypodium within Cnidaria. Removal of the long-branched myxozoans from the 18S dataset also results in Polypodium being nested within Cnidaria. These results suggest that previous reports showing that Polypodium and Myxozoa form a sister group to Bilateria were an artifact of long-branch attraction. CONCLUSION: By including 28S rDNA sequences and a comprehensive sampling of cnidarian taxa, we demonstrate that previously conflicting hypotheses concerning the phylogenetic placement of Polypodium can be reconciled. Specifically, the data presented provide evidence that Polypodium is indeed a cnidarian and is either the sister taxon to Hydrozoa, or part of the hydrozoan clade, Leptothecata. The former hypothesis is consistent with the traditional view that Polypodium should be placed in its own cnidarian class, Polypodiozoa.
Authors: Jenny Qiu-Yun Xiang; Michael L Moody; Douglas E Soltis; Chaunzhu Fan; Pamela S Soltis; Chaun zhu Fan Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Allen G Collins; Peter Schuchert; Antonio C Marques; Thomas Jankowski; Mónica Medina; Bernd Schierwater Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 15.683
Authors: M L Kent; K B Andree; J L Bartholomew; M El-Matbouli; S S Desser; R H Devlin; S W Feist; R P Hedrick; R W Hoffmann; J Khattra; S L Hallett; R J Lester; M Longshaw; O Palenzeula; M E Siddall; C Xiao Journal: J Eukaryot Microbiol Date: 2001 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Heather Bracken-Grissom; Allen G Collins; Timothy Collins; Keith Crandall; Daniel Distel; Casey Dunn; Gonzalo Giribet; Steven Haddock; Nancy Knowlton; Mark Martindale; Mónica Medina; Charles Messing; Stephen J O'Brien; Gustav Paulay; Nicolas Putnam; Timothy Ravasi; Greg W Rouse; Joseph F Ryan; Anja Schulze; Gert Wörheide; Maja Adamska; Xavier Bailly; Jesse Breinholt; William E Browne; M Christina Diaz; Nathaniel Evans; Jean-François Flot; Nicole Fogarty; Matthew Johnston; Bishoy Kamel; Akito Y Kawahara; Tammy Laberge; Dennis Lavrov; François Michonneau; Leonid L Moroz; Todd Oakley; Karen Osborne; Shirley A Pomponi; Adelaide Rhodes; Scott R Santos; Nori Satoh; Robert W Thacker; Yves Van de Peer; Christian R Voolstra; David Mark Welch; Judith Winston; Xin Zhou Journal: J Hered Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.645
Authors: Tiago Milanin; Stephen D Atkinson; Márcia R M Silva; Roberto G Alves; Luiz Eduardo R Tavares; Amanda M Ribeiro; Antonio A M Maia Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Nathaniel M Evans; Alberto Lindner; Ekaterina V Raikova; Allen G Collins; Paulyn Cartwright Journal: BMC Evol Biol Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 3.260
Authors: Maximilian P Nesnidal; Martin Helmkampf; Iris Bruchhaus; Mansour El-Matbouli; Bernhard Hausdorf Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240