BACKGROUND: Ependymomas account for 2% of all intracranial tumors in adults. Supratentorial ependymomas are less common than their infratentorial counterparts. To the authors' knowledge to date, the predictive values of surgery, histology, and patient-related prognostic factors for these tumors remain unresolved. The authors report a series of adult patients with supratentorial ependymomas to characterize the roles of surgery and histology in tumor control. METHODS: The authors retrospectively studied a homogenous population of 46 adult patients who had supratentorial ependymomas from 24 French neurosurgical centers between 1990 and 2004. All clinicoradiologic and follow-up data were analyzed, and a central pathologic review was performed by 2 certified neuropathologists. RESULTS: The mean (+/-standard error) 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for the entire population were 57.1% +/- 8.7% and 41.8% +/- 9.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates for the entire cohort were of 33.8% +/- 8.1% and 25.4 +/- 8%, respectively. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, age <55 years, greater extent of surgery, and lower histologic grade were associated with longer overall and progression-free survival. However, longer progression-free survival but was not considered a candidate variable for the multivariate model, because data were available for only 34 of 46 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In association with age and extent of surgery, histologic grade was identified as a major prognostic factor in adult supratentorial ependymomas. The application of a simple and reproducible grading scheme using objective anaplastic criteria appeared to be both useful practically and clinically applicable. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with incompletely resected, low-grade ependymomas needs to be investigated further. (Copyright) 2008 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND:Ependymomas account for 2% of all intracranial tumors in adults. Supratentorial ependymomas are less common than their infratentorial counterparts. To the authors' knowledge to date, the predictive values of surgery, histology, and patient-related prognostic factors for these tumors remain unresolved. The authors report a series of adult patients with supratentorial ependymomas to characterize the roles of surgery and histology in tumor control. METHODS: The authors retrospectively studied a homogenous population of 46 adult patients who had supratentorial ependymomas from 24 French neurosurgical centers between 1990 and 2004. All clinicoradiologic and follow-up data were analyzed, and a central pathologic review was performed by 2 certified neuropathologists. RESULTS: The mean (+/-standard error) 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for the entire population were 57.1% +/- 8.7% and 41.8% +/- 9.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates for the entire cohort were of 33.8% +/- 8.1% and 25.4 +/- 8%, respectively. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, age <55 years, greater extent of surgery, and lower histologic grade were associated with longer overall and progression-free survival. However, longer progression-free survival but was not considered a candidate variable for the multivariate model, because data were available for only 34 of 46 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In association with age and extent of surgery, histologic grade was identified as a major prognostic factor in adult supratentorial ependymomas. The application of a simple and reproducible grading scheme using objective anaplastic criteria appeared to be both useful practically and clinically applicable. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with incompletely resected, low-grade ependymomas needs to be investigated further. (Copyright) 2008 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Ayal A Aizer; Marek Ancukiewicz; Paul L Nguyen; Shannon M Macdonald; Torunn I Yock; Nancy J Tarbell; Helen A Shih; Jay S Loeffler; Kevin S Oh Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jamie J Van Gompel; Kelly K Koeller; Fredric B Meyer; W Richard Marsh; Peter C Burger; Federico Roncaroli; Gregory A Worrell; Caterina Giannini Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Efrat Landau; Frederick A Boop; Heather M Conklin; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Thomas E Merchant Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: F Fauchon; M Hasselblatt; A Jouvet; J Champier; M Popovic; R Kirollos; T Santarius; S Amemiya; T Kumabe; D Frappaz; M Lonjon; M Fèvre Montange; A Vasiljevic Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-01-12 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Eli T Sayegh; Derick Aranda; Joseph M Kim; Taemin Oh; Andrew T Parsa; Michael C Oh Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 1.961