Literature DB >> 18469962

Prediction of heterosis in wheat using coefficient of parentage and RFLP-based estimates of genetic relationship.

J F Barbosa-Neto, M E Sorrells, G Cisar.   

Abstract

Genetic relationship can be a useful predictor of the relative performance of hybrid combinations for a hybrid breeding program resulting in reduced time and cost of hybrid testing. Genetic relationships of 112 wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) lines were estimated using 41 DNA clones hybridizing to 273 DNA fragments and by calculating coefficient of parentage (COP). Heterosis was estimated for 722 hybrids grown in multiple locations, with 189 being tested in more than 1 year. The average RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) based genetic distance index (DI) was 0.35. Midparent heterosis for grain yield ranged from −20 to 57% and high-parent heterosis from −22 to 47%. The correlation between RFLP-based estimates of genetic distance and COP was nonsignificant (−0.33). Coefficient of parentage was significantly correlated with heterosis for all traits in 1991 but not in other years. Genetic distance based on RFLPs scored in this study was not correlated with heterosis in any of the years tested. Further refinement of gene pools and new prediction methods will be required to facilitate the exploitation of genetic variability for hybrid wheat improvement. Key words : wheat, heterosis, genetic distance.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 18469962     DOI: 10.1139/g96-144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  13 in total

1.  Permutation tests for the correlation among genetic distances and measures of heterosis.

Authors:  H P Piepho
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals.

Authors:  Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Jonathan Mühleisen; Hans Peter Maurer; Hongliang Zhang; Manje Gowda; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  A unified framework for hybrid breeding and the establishment of heterotic groups in wheat.

Authors:  Philipp H G Boeven; C Friedrich H Longin; Tobias Würschum
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genetic diversity and selection of genotypes to enhance Zn and Fe content in common bean.

Authors:  Z I Talukder; E Anderson; P N Miklas; M W Blair; J Osorno; M Dilawari; K G Hossain
Journal:  Can J Plant Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.018

5.  Molecular Markers for Biomass Traits: Association, Interaction and Genetic Divergence in Silkworm Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Appukuttannair R Pradeep; Anuradha H Jingade; Raje S Urs
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-05-30

6.  Hybrid wheat: quantitative genetic parameters and consequences for the design of breeding programs.

Authors:  Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Manje Gowda; Jonathan Mühleisen; Erhard Ebmeyer; Ebrahim Kazman; Ralf Schachschneider; Johannes Schacht; Martin Kirchhoff; Yusheng Zhao; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 7.  Methods to predict transgressive segregation in barley and other self-pollinated crops.

Authors:  Anetta Kuczyńska; Maria Surma; Tadeusz Adamski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.653

8.  Performance prediction of crosses in plant breeding through genotype by environment interactions.

Authors:  Javad Ansarifar; Faezeh Akhavizadegan; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nonlinear phenotypic variation uncovers the emergence of heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  François Vasseur; Louise Fouqueau; Dominique de Vienne; Thibault Nidelet; Cyrille Violle; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A large-scale pedigree resource of wheat reveals evidence for adaptation and selection by breeders.

Authors:  Nick Fradgley; Keith A Gardner; James Cockram; James Elderfield; John M Hickey; Phil Howell; Robert Jackson; Ian J Mackay
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.