Literature DB >> 18469680

Differences in standing and forward bending in women with chronic low back or pelvic girdle pain: indications for physical compensation strategies.

Jan-Paul van Wingerden1, Andry Vleeming, Inge Ronchetti.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This cohort study compares motion characteristics during forward bending of a group of chronic female patients either with low back pain (LBP) or pelvic girdle pain (PGP) and healthy subjects using computer-video analysis.
OBJECTIVE: This study determines whether subcategories of back pain patients could be distinguished by motion characteristics of the pelvis and lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compared with healthy subjects, patients with low back pain bend forward in distinct manners. Clustering these motion patterns into specific patient subgroups has been challenging since a basis for subcategorizing was lacking. Chronic LBP can be distinguished from PGP using specific evidence-based diagnostic tests. This allows comparing the motion characteristics of subgroups of chronic patients with either LBP or PGP.
METHODS: Forward bending was recorded in both female patients groups and healthy female individuals, using a computer video analysis system. Trunk motion, pelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis are represented as sagittal plane angles. From these angles, the relative contribution of the lumbar spine and hip joint to forward bending can be derived.
RESULTS: Specific and discriminating motion characteristics were found between groups. During erect stance in the PGP group, the pelvis is significantly tilted backwards. At maximally forward bending, the ROM of the trunk is limited in all patient groups, but only the PGP group has significantly limited hip motion. During the initial part of forward bending, lumbar motion is increased in PGP patients and decreased in LBP patients. In the final part of forward bending contribution of the lumbar spine is increased in both patient groups.
CONCLUSION: BP and PGP patients show specific, consistent, and distinct motion patterns. These motion patterns are assumed to be functional compensation strategies, following altered neuromuscular coordination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18469680     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fcf6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Timing and magnitude of lumbar spine contribution to trunk forward bending and backward return in patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Milad Vazirian; Elizabeth G Salt; Linda R Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Lumbopelvic rhythm in the sagittal plane: A review of the effects of participants and task characteristics.

Authors:  Milad Vazirian; Linda R Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Int Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 3.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Craig S Roberts; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Course and prognosis of recovery for chronic non-specific low back pain: design, therapy program and baseline data of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Verkerk; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Inge Ronchetti; Harald S Miedema; Annelies Pool-Goudzwaard; Jan-Paul van Wingerden; Bart W Koes
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The effect of different lumbar belt designs on the lumbopelvic rhythm in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Jean-Maxime Caron; Richard Preuss; Hakim Mecheri
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The effects of bending speed on the lumbo-pelvic kinematics and movement pattern during forward bending in people with and without low back pain.

Authors:  Sharon M H Tsang; Grace P Y Szeto; Linda M K Li; Dim C M Wong; Millie M P Yip; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Lumbopelvic rhythm during trunk motion in the sagittal plane: A review of the kinematic measurement methods and characterization approaches.

Authors:  Milad Vazirian; Linda Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Phys Ther Rehabil       Date:  2016

8.  Is there evidence to use kinematic/kinetic measures clinically in low back pain patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Enrica Papi; Anthony M J Bull; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Recovery of the lumbopelvic movement and muscle recruitment patterns using motor control exercise program in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A prospective study.

Authors:  Sharon M H Tsang; Grace P Y Szeto; Angelina K C Yeung; Eva Y W Chun; Caroline N C Wong; Edwin C M Wu; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How clinicians analyze movement quality in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional survey study with Dutch allied health care professionals.

Authors:  Margriet van Dijk; Nienke Smorenburg; Bart Visser; Yvonne F Heerkens; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.