Literature DB >> 18469214

Multiple systems in decision making.

Alan G Sanfey1, Luke J Chang.   

Abstract

Neuroeconomics seeks to gain a greater understanding of decision making by combining theoretical and methodological principles from the fields of psychology, economics, and neuroscience. Initial studies using this multidisciplinary approach have found evidence suggesting that the brain may be employing multiple levels of processing when making decisions, and this notion is consistent with dual-processing theories that have received extensive theoretical consideration in the field of cognitive psychology, with these theories arguing for the dissociation between automatic and controlled components of processing. While behavioral studies provide compelling support for the distinction between automatic and controlled processing in judgment and decision making, less is known if these components have a corresponding neural substrate, with some researchers arguing that there is no evidence suggesting a distinct neural basis. This chapter will discuss the behavioral evidence supporting the dissociation between automatic and controlled processing in decision making and review recent literature suggesting potential neural systems that may underlie these processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18469214     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1399.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  26 in total

1.  Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context.

Authors:  Berna Güroğlu; Wouter van den Bos; Serge A R B Rombouts; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  A systematic examination of preoperative surgery warm-up routines.

Authors:  T W Pike; S Pathak; F Mushtaq; R M Wilkie; M Mon-Williams; J P A Lodge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The risky business of dopamine agonists in Parkinson disease and impulse control disorders.

Authors:  Daniel O Claassen; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Charles K Jessup; Madaline B Harrison; G Frederick Wooten; Scott A Wylie
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunliang Feng; Yue-Jia Luo; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Brain responses to social norms: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies.

Authors:  Oksana Zinchenko; Marie Arsalidou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Loneliness Interacts With Cognition in Relation to Healthcare and Financial Decision Making Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Christopher C Stewart; Lei Yu; Crystal M Glover; Gary Mottola; David A Bennett; Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-11-23

7.  Neural substrates of context- and person-dependent altruistic punishment.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Xiaping Lu; Ruolei Gu; Ruida Zhu; Rui Xu; Lucas S Broster; Chunliang Feng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis state of the science: empirical analogies for research and implementation.

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; Don Operario; Pamina M Gorbach
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  A negative emotional and economic judgment bias in major depression.

Authors:  Dirk Scheele; Yoan Mihov; Olga Schwederski; Wolfgang Maier; René Hurlemann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 10.  Competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory of cocaine addiction: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Sarah E Snider; Amanda J Quisenberry; Jeffrey S Stein; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.