PURPOSE: To determine the roles of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin in Müller cell reactivity. METHODS: Retinal detachments were created in mice deficient for GFAP and vimentin (GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-)) and age-matched wild-type (wt) mice. The reactivity of the retina was studied by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Müller cell morphology was different and glutamine synthetase immunoreactivity was reduced in the undisturbed GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) retinas. After retinal detachment, Müller cells formed subretinal glial scars in the wt mice. In contrast, such scars were not observed in GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mice. Müller cells, which normally elongate and thicken in response to detachment, appeared compressed, thin, and "spikey" in the GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mice. The end foot region of Müller cells in the GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mice often sheared away from the rest of the retina during detachment, corroborating earlier results showing decreased resistance of this region in GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) retinas to mechanical stress. In regions with end foot shearing, ganglion cells showed intense neurite sprouting, as revealed by anti-neurofilament labeling, a response rarely observed in wt mice. CONCLUSIONS: Müller cells are subtly different in the GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mouse retina before detachment. The end foot region of these cells may be structurally reinforced by the presence of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton, and our data suggest a critical role for these proteins in Müller cell reaction to retinal detachment and participation in subretinal gliosis.
PURPOSE: To determine the roles of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin in Müller cell reactivity. METHODS: Retinal detachments were created in mice deficient for GFAP and vimentin (GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-)) and age-matched wild-type (wt) mice. The reactivity of the retina was studied by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Müller cell morphology was different and glutamine synthetase immunoreactivity was reduced in the undisturbed GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) retinas. After retinal detachment, Müller cells formed subretinal glial scars in the wt mice. In contrast, such scars were not observed in GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mice. Müller cells, which normally elongate and thicken in response to detachment, appeared compressed, thin, and "spikey" in the GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mice. The end foot region of Müller cells in the GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mice often sheared away from the rest of the retina during detachment, corroborating earlier results showing decreased resistance of this region in GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) retinas to mechanical stress. In regions with end foot shearing, ganglion cells showed intense neurite sprouting, as revealed by anti-neurofilament labeling, a response rarely observed in wt mice. CONCLUSIONS: Müller cells are subtly different in the GFAP(-/-)vim(-/-) mouse retina before detachment. The end foot region of these cells may be structurally reinforced by the presence of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton, and our data suggest a critical role for these proteins in Müller cell reaction to retinal detachment and participation in subretinal gliosis.
Authors: Charanjit S Sethi; Geoffrey P Lewis; Steven K Fisher; William P Leitner; Derrick L Mann; Philip J Luthert; David G Charteris Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: John C Dreixler; Anthony Bratton; Eugenie Du; Afzhal R Shaikh; Brian Savoie; Michael Alexander; Marcus M Marcet; Steven Roth Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2010-11-20 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: John C Dreixler; Ajay Sampat; Afzhal R Shaikh; Michael Alexander; Marcus M Marcet; Steven Roth Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2011-05-15 Impact factor: 3.444
Authors: Wendy M Aartsen; Koen W R van Cleef; Lucie P Pellissier; Robert M Hoek; Rogier M Vos; Bas Blits; Erich M E Ehlert; Kamaljit S Balaggan; Robin R Ali; Joost Verhaagen; Jan Wijnholds Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gabriel Luna; Sten Kjellstrom; Mark R Verardo; Geoffrey P Lewis; Jiyun Byun; Paul A Sieving; Steven K Fisher Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 4.799