Literature DB >> 18469151

Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction.

Ethan Kross1, Ozlem Ayduk.   

Abstract

Two studies examined the psychological processes that facilitate adaptive emotional analysis. In Study 1, participants recalled a depression experience and then analyzed their feelings from either a self-immersed (immersed-analysis) or self-distanced (distanced-analysis) perspective. Participants in the distanced-analysis group focused less on recounting their experience and more on reconstruing it, which in turn led to lower levels of depressed affect. Furthermore, comparisons to a distraction group indicated that distanced-analysis was as effective as distraction in reducing depressed affect relative to the immersed-analysis group. Study 2 replicated these findings and showed that both 1 day and 7 days after the experimental manipulations, participants in the distanced-analysis group remained buffered against depressed affect and reported experiencing fewer recurring thoughts about their depression experience over time compared to both the immersed-analysis and distraction groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18469151     DOI: 10.1177/0146167208315938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  65 in total

1.  Previously reappraised: the lasting effect of description type on picture-elicited electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Annmarie Macnamara; Kevin N Ochsner; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Double dissociation: circadian off-peak times increase emotional reactivity; aging impairs emotion regulation via reappraisal.

Authors:  Adrienne M Tucker; Rebecca Feuerstein; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Kevin N Ochsner; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-05-28

3.  Spontaneous Self-Distancing and Adaptive Self-Reflection Across Adolescence.

Authors:  Rachel E White; Ethan Kross; Angela L Duckworth
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 4.  Regulating emotion through distancing: A taxonomy, neurocognitive model, and supporting meta-analysis.

Authors:  John P Powers; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Jason T Buhle; Jennifer A Silvers; Tor D Wager; Richard Lopez; Chukwudi Onyemekwu; Hedy Kober; Jochen Weber; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Time course of emotion-related responding during distraction and reappraisal.

Authors:  Sandra Schönfelder; Philipp Kanske; Janine Heissler; Michèle Wessa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  Decentering and Related Constructs: A Critical Review and Metacognitive Processes Model.

Authors:  Amit Bernstein; Yuval Hadash; Yael Lichtash; Galia Tanay; Kathrine Shepherd; David M Fresco
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09

8.  Toward a Personalized Science of Emotion Regulation.

Authors:  Bruce P Doré; Jennifer A Silvers; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2016-04-03

9.  Stories for all ages: Narrating anger reduces distress across childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Cecilia Wainryb; Monisha Pasupathi; Stacia Bourne; Kris Oldroyd
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 10.  An attentional scope model of rumination.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.