Literature DB >> 18469061

Effect of litter size and birth weight on growth, carcass and pork quality, and their relationship to postmortem proteolysis.

J Bérard1, M Kreuzer, G Bee.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that birth weight (BtW) influences growth, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and postmortem (pm) proteolysis differently when pigs originate from small (S) or large (L) litters. Swiss Large White barrows (60) used in this study originated from 20 litters with either less than 10 (S) or more than 14 (L) piglets born per litter. Within each of the S and L litters, 3 barrows were selected at birth: the lightest (L-BtW), the heaviest (H-BtW), and the one with a BtW nearest to the average BtW of the litter (M-BtW). The BW and total feed intake of the individually penned pigs were determined weekly. At slaughter, carcass characteristics were assessed. Meat quality traits were determined in the LM and dark portion of semitendinosus muscle. Titin, nebulin, desmin, and integrin proteolysis were evaluated by SDS-PAGE and Western blot technique, and mu - and m-calpain activities were monitored using casein zymography. Litter size affected BtW of L-BtW and M-BtW but not of H-BtW barrows (BtW x litter size interaction; P = 0.07). From weaning to slaughter, L-BtW barrows grew slower (P < 0.01), ingested less feed (P < 0.01), and were less efficient (P < 0.01) than H-BtW and M-BtW barrows. The carcass yields were greater (P < 0.01), and livers and kidneys were lighter (P </= 0.01) in L-BtW compared with H-BtW barrows. Regardless of BtW, barrows from S litters had greater percentages of shoulder (P = 0.02) and lower percentages of omental fat (P = 0.06) than barrows from L litters. Compared with the LM of H-BtW barrows, the LM of L-BtW barrows was redder (P < 0.01). The semi-tendinosus muscle of M-BtW barrows was more (P < 0.01) tender than that of L-BtW and H-BtW barrows. The extent of titin and nebulin proteolysis at 24 and 72 h pm was greater (P </= 0.07) in the LM of H-BtW than in L-BtW barrows. At 72 h pm, integrin of the LM had been less (P = 0.08) degraded in barrows originating from S than from L litters. These results confirm the known effect of BtW on growth performance, whereas its effect on carcass characteristic and meat quality traits could only be partially demonstrated. Although litter size affected average BtW of the L-BtW and M-BtW barrows, its effect on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality was minor. The almost complete absence of significant BtW x litter size interaction indicates that litter size affects swine growth and carcass and meat quality through its inverse relationship with BtW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18469061     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-0893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Human skeletal muscle biochemical diversity.

Authors:  Timothy F Tirrell; Mark S Cook; J Austin Carr; Evie Lin; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Body weight of newborn and suckling piglets affects their intestinal gene expression.

Authors:  Sandra Villagómez-Estrada; José F Pérez; Diego Melo-Durán; Francesc Gonzalez-Solè; Matilde D'Angelo; Francisco J Pérez-Cano; David Solà-Oriol
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Surgical castration with pain relief affects the health and productive performance of pigs in the suckling period.

Authors:  Joaquin Morales; Andre Dereu; Alberto Manso; Laura de Frutos; Carlos Piñeiro; Edgar G Manzanilla; Niels Wuyts
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-09-06

Review 4.  Fetal and neonatal programming of postnatal growth and feed efficiency in swine.

Authors:  Yun Ji; Zhenlong Wu; Zhaolai Dai; Xiaolong Wang; Ju Li; Binggen Wang; Guoyao Wu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05

5.  Maternal undernutrition and offspring sex determine birth-weight, postnatal development and meat characteristics in traditional swine breeds.

Authors:  M Vázquez-Gómez; C García-Contreras; L Torres-Rovira; S Astiz; C Óvilo; A González-Bulnes; B Isabel
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-19

6.  Does intrauterine crowding affect locomotor development? A comparative study of motor performance, neuromotor maturation and gait variability among piglets that differ in birth weight and vitality.

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Hole; Peter Aerts; Sara Prims; Miriam Ayuso; Steven Van Cruchten; Chris Van Ginneken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How does intrauterine crowding affect locomotor performance in newborn pigs? A study of force generating capacity and muscle composition of the hind limb.

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Hole; Silke Cleuren; Chris Van Ginneken; Sara Prims; Miriam Ayuso; Steven Van Cruchten; Peter Aerts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does intrauterine crowding affect the force generating capacity and muscle composition of the piglet front limb?

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Hole; Chris Van Ginneken; Sara Prims; Miriam Ayuso; Steven Van Cruchten; Peter Aerts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differences in the Gut Microbiota Establishment and Metabolome Characteristics Between Low- and Normal-Birth-Weight Piglets During Early-Life.

Authors:  Na Li; Shimeng Huang; Lili Jiang; Wei Wang; Tiantian Li; Bin Zuo; Zhen Li; Junjun Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Effects of L-Glutamine Supplementation during the Gestation of Gilts and Sows on the Offspring Development in a Traditional Swine Breed.

Authors:  Marta Vázquez-Gómez; Consolación García-Contreras; Susana Astiz; Laura Torres-Rovira; José Luis Pesantez-Pacheco; Ana Heras-Molina; Teresa Castro Madrigal; Clemente López-Bote; Cristina Óvilo; Antonio González-Bulnes; Beatriz Isabel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.