Literature DB >> 18468501

Frontalis midline dehiscence: an anatomical study and discussion of clinical relevance.

Jeffrey H Spiegel1, Ryan C Goerig, Rebecca S Lufler, Todd M Hoagland.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The frontalis muscle has a midline dehiscence that has not been well described. The anatomic characteristics of the muscles of the central forehead are important to effectively treat rhytids in this area, e.g. with botulinum toxin.
METHODS: Anatomical dissections of 21 cadaver foreheads.
RESULTS: For males, the midline attenuation point occurred in a range from 1.4 to 6 cm above the horizontal orbital rim plane, with the mean being 3.5+/-1.6 cm. The mean angle of the left muscle belly in the male cadavers was 26.0+/-17.4 degrees off the midline, while the right was 36.4+/-14.9 degrees. Overall average angulation was 62.4 degrees (Figure 4). The mean distances between left and right muscle bellies at 4 cm, 5 cm and 6 cm superior to the orbital rim were 1.2 cm, 1.9 cm and 3.1 cm, respectively. The mean distance of dehiscence in the midline from the horizontal reference plane of the female cadavers was 3.7+/-1.8 cm, with a range of 1.3 to 6.0 cm. The left frontalis belly formed an angle with the midline of 15.9+/-16.6 degrees, while the right belly formed an angle of 22.3+/-20.1 degrees, with an overall average angle of 38.2 degrees. The interbelly distances at 3, 4, 5 and 6 cm were 0.4 cm, 0.9 cm, 1.7 cm and 2.6 cm, respectively. One third of females had no midline frontalis dehiscence at 6 cm above the orbital rims.
CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic characterization of the midline frontalis muscle dehiscence permits more intelligent placement of chemotherapeutic agents when treating forehead rhytids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468501     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Characterizing the Lateral Border of the Frontalis for Safe and Effective Injection of Botulinum Toxin.

Authors:  You-Jin Choi; Sung-Yoon Won; Jae-Gi Lee; Kyung-Seok Hu; Sung-Taek Kim; Tanvaa Tansatit; Hee-Jin Kim
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Features of facial asymmetry following incomplete recovery from facial paralysis.

Authors:  Jin Kim; Hyung Rok Lee; Jun Hui Jeong; Won Sang Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Tailored botulinum toxin type A injections in aesthetic medicine: consensus panel recommendations for treating the forehead based on individual facial anatomy and muscle tone.

Authors:  Javier Anido; Daniel Arenas; Cristina Arruabarrena; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; Carlos Fajardo; Mar Mira; Javier Murillo; Natalia Ribé; Helga Rivera; Sofia Ruiz Del Cueto; Helder Silvestre; Marisa Tirado
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2017-10-19

Review 4.  Neurophysiological Measures of Efficacy and Safety for Botulinum Toxin Injection in Facial and Bulbar Muscles: Special Considerations.

Authors:  Mohammad Alimohammadi; Anna Rostedt Punga
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.