Literature DB >> 1846798

Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches.

W B Tuckson1, V W Fazio.   

Abstract

Ileal pouch function in 35 patients operated upon by the same surgeon were compared. Seventeen of the patients had a double loop (J) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and 18 a triple loop (S) pouch. The patients were examined a mean of 27.9 months and 5.1 months, respectively, after ileostomy closure. Ten of the S-pouch patients were evaluated more than 6 months (S greater than 6 months), mean 9.1 after ileostomy closure. There were no differences in the mean maximum resting pressures or maximum squeeze pressures between the groups. The incidence of daytime and nocturnal leakage was lower in the S-pouch group, 22 and 29 percent, than in the J group 29, and 53 percent. Though the mean maximum tolerated volume (MTV) of the S-pouch group was greater than the J group, the difference was not statistically significant. The difference in the mean compliance between the J- and S-pouch groups and the J and S greater than 6 months group was statistically significant (P less than 0.01) and (P less than 0.008). All the patients could evacuate spontaneously. The difference in the 24-hour frequency of defecation between the S greater than 6 months and J group was significant (P less than 0.05), but not between the S and J groups. The median frequency of nocturnal defecation between the S greater than 6 months and J pouch groups was significant (P less than 0.005), but not between the S and J groups. The triple loop S-pouches were more compliant than the J-pouches and had a better functional result as shown by a lower incidence of nocturnal leakage, and a lower frequency of defecation during the day and night.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1846798     DOI: 10.1007/bf02050201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Serum biochemical evaluation of patients with functional pouches ten to 20 years after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Amosy Ephreim M'Koma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Reduced pouch capacitance due to gynaecological pathology.

Authors:  C T Speakman; P B Boulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the current ochsner experience.

Authors:  Shahrazad Talebinejad; Terry C Hicks; David A Margolin; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David E Beck
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

5.  Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Victor W Fazio; Ian C Lavery; Feza H Remzi; Antony J Senagore; James S Wu; Scott A Strong; Jan D Poloneicki; Tracy L Hull; James M Church
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  V W Fazio; M G O'Riordain; I C Lavery; J M Church; P Lau; S A Strong; T Hull
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Current Approaches to Pediatric Polyposis Syndromes.

Authors:  Aodhnait S Fahy; Christopher R Moir
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-02-25

9.  The role of scintigraphic defecography in the assessment of bowel function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Francesco Selvaggi; Alberto Cuocolo; Antonio Giuliani; Guido Sciaudone; Gabriele Riegler; Ciro Mainolfi; Maria Grazia Caprio; Maria Rosaria Panico; Irene Fiume
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.