Literature DB >> 1846793

Differentiation between the intensity of breathlessness and the distress it evokes in normal subjects during exercise.

R C Wilson1, P W Jones.   

Abstract

1. This study was designed to examine whether normal subjects could differentiate between the 'intensity' of their breathlessness and the amount of 'distress' it evoked, by specific wording of the instructions. 2. A preliminary study showed no significant difference between 'distress' score during exercise measured on two separate occasions (P = 0.3). 3. Ten subjects each performed two identical incremental cycle-ergometer exercise tests on separate occasions during which they were asked to quantify either 'intensity' or 'distress' by using modified Borg scales. 4. In all subjects there was a significant correlation (P less than 0.001) between 'intensity' and minute ventilation. In eight subjects there was a significant correlation (P less than 0.05) between 'distress' and minute ventilation. One subject displayed no significant correlation and one registered no distress. 5. Mean 'intensity' was greater than the mean 'distress' (P = 0.0001). The slope of 'intensity'/minute ventilation was greater than the slope of 'distress'/minute ventilation (P = 0.0001). 6. Within individuals there was a significant correlation between 'intensity' and 'distress' (P less than 0.05). There was a wide scatter in the slope of this relationship between subjects and maximum 'intensity' and 'distress' did not correlate. 7. Different elements of the breathlessness sensation could be identified and selectively measured depending on the wording of the instructions given to the subject. 8. There was a wide intersubject variation in the magnitude of both breathlessness 'intensity' and 'distress' estimates, but the differences between subjects in these two components of the sensation did not appear to follow a common pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1846793     DOI: 10.1042/cs0800065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  15 in total

Review 1.  Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P W Jones
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Quality of life measurement for patients with diseases of the airways.

Authors:  P W Jones
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Time to exhaustion at maximal lactate steady state is similar for cycling and running in moderately trained subjects.

Authors:  Piero Fontana; Urs Boutellier; Claudia Knöpfli-Lenzin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Reliability and validity of the multidimensional dyspnea profile.

Authors:  Paula M Meek; Robert Banzett; Mark B Parsall; Richard H Gracely; Richard M Schwartzstein; Robert Lansing
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Current perspectives on symptom perception in asthma: a biomedical and psychological review.

Authors:  S Rietveld; J F Brosschot
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1999

6.  An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea.

Authors:  Mark B Parshall; Richard M Schwartzstein; Lewis Adams; Robert B Banzett; Harold L Manning; Jean Bourbeau; Peter M Calverley; Audrey G Gift; Andrew Harver; Suzanne C Lareau; Donald A Mahler; Paula M Meek; Denis E O'Donnell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12.

Authors:  J Yorke; S H Moosavi; C Shuldham; P W Jones
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Additional evidence for the affective dimension of dyspnea in patients with COPD.

Authors:  Virginia Carrieri-Kohlman; DorAnne Donesky-Cuenco; Soo Kyung Park; Lynda Mackin; Huong Q Nguyen; Steven M Paul
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 9.  The multiple dimensions of dyspnea: review and hypotheses.

Authors:  Robert W Lansing; Richard H Gracely; Robert B Banzett
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.931

10.  The affective dimension of laboratory dyspnea: air hunger is more unpleasant than work/effort.

Authors:  Robert B Banzett; Sarah H Pedersen; Richard M Schwartzstein; Robert W Lansing
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.