Literature DB >> 18467719

Lapatinib versus hormone therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial.

Alain Ravaud1, Robert Hawkins, Jason P Gardner, Hans von der Maase, Niko Zantl, Peter Harper, Frédéric Rolland, Bruno Audhuy, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Frank Pétavy, Martin Gore, Patrick Schöffski, Iman El-Hariry.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lapatinib is an orally reversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) tyrosine kinases with demonstrated activity in patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer. In the current phase III open-label trial, lapatinib was compared with hormone therapy (HT) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that express EGFR and/or HER-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced RCC who had experienced disease progression through first-line cytokine therapy--stratified by Karnofsky performance status and number of metastatic sites--were randomly assigned to lapatinib 1,250 mg daily or HT. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP); secondary end points included overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analyses.
RESULTS: Four hundred sixteen patients were enrolled onto the study. Median TTP was 15.3 weeks for lapatinib versus 15.4 weeks for HT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.94; P = .60), and median OS was 46.9 weeks for lapatinib versus 43.1 weeks for HT (HR = 0.88; P = .29). In a biomarker analysis of patients with EGFR-overexpressed tumors (3+ by immunohistochemistry [IHC]; n = 241) median TTP was 15.1 weeks for lapatinib versus 10.9 weeks for HT (HR = 0.76; P = .06), and median OS was 46.0 weeks for lapatinib versus 37.9 weeks for HT (HR = 0.69; P = .02). These results were confirmed by Cox regression analysis. No unexpected toxicities were observed; the most commonly reported drug-related adverse events (all grades) for lapatinib were rash (44%) and diarrhea (40%).
CONCLUSION: Lapatinib was well tolerated with equivalent overall efficacy to HT in advanced RCC patients who had experienced disease progression while receiving cytokines, and the study supports that lapatinib prolonged OS relative to HT in patients with 3+ EGFR status determined by IHC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18467719     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Uro-oncology--update 2009].

Authors:  T Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Epigenetic regulation in RCC: opportunities for therapeutic intervention?

Authors:  James Larkin; Xin Yi Goh; Marcus Vetter; Lisa Pickering; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  VHL-HIF-2α axis-induced SMYD3 upregulation drives renal cell carcinoma progression via direct trans-activation of EGFR.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Li Liu; Kun Wang; Xiao-Feng Li; Li-Yuan Ge; Run-Zhuo Ma; Yi-Dong Fan; Lu-Chao Li; Zheng-Fang Liu; Min Qiu; Yi-Chang Hao; Zhen-Feng Shi; Chuan-You Xia; Klas Strååt; Yi Huang; Lu-Lin Ma; Dawei Xu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Grb7 upregulation is a molecular adaptation to HER2 signaling inhibition due to removal of Akt-mediated gene repression.

Authors:  Alessio Nencioni; Michele Cea; Anna Garuti; Mario Passalacqua; Lizzia Raffaghello; Debora Soncini; Eva Moran; Gabriele Zoppoli; Vito Pistoia; Franco Patrone; Alberto Ballestrero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Megestrol acetate versus metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients having exhausted all effective therapies under standard care.

Authors:  N Penel; S Clisant; E Dansin; C Desauw; M Dégardin; L Mortier; M Vanhuyse; F Bonodeau; C Fournier; J-L Cazin; A Adenis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Everolimus: the first approved product for patients with advanced renal cell cancer after sunitinib and/or sorafenib.

Authors:  Chris Coppin
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-05-25

7.  Safety and efficacy of the combination of erlotinib and sirolimus for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of sunitinib or sorafenib.

Authors:  T W Flaig; L J Costa; D L Gustafson; K Breaker; M K Schultz; F Crighton; F J Kim; H Drabkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Phase II study of erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic papillary histology renal cell cancer: SWOG S0317.

Authors:  Michael S Gordon; Michael Hussey; Raymond B Nagle; Primo N Lara; Philip C Mack; Janice Dutcher; Wolfram Samlowski; Joseph I Clark; David I Quinn; Chong-Xian Pan; David Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  [Value of targeted therapies for renal cell cancer].

Authors:  A S Merseburger; M A Kuczyk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Combining the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor RAD001 strongly inhibits adhesion and growth of renal cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Eva Juengel; Johanna Engler; Iyad Natsheh; Jon Jones; Ausra Mickuckyte; Lukasz Hudak; Dietger Jonas; Roman A Blaheta
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.