Literature DB >> 18467131

Selection of the control group for VBM analysis: influence of covariates, matching and sample size.

Gaby S Pell1, Regula S Briellmann, Chow Huat Patrick Chan, Heath Pardoe, David F Abbott, Graeme D Jackson.   

Abstract

Variability in the control group plays a crucial role in voxel-based morphometry (VBM) detection of structural abnormalities. Two common methods of minimising this variance are inclusion of covariates and matching of control and patient groups. We address two major questions: What are the optimal covariates in the VBM design? When a large pool of controls are available, is it better to choose a subset of matched control subjects at the expense of numbers, or include all available controls? We used regression analysis in a group of 176 controls to determine the contribution of gender, age, and total intracranial volume (TIV) to volume variation. We then used different matching and covariate strategies to determine the optimal design for VBM detection of abnormality in epilepsy patients with hippocampal sclerosis. In the regression analysis, focal gender effects disappeared with inclusion of TIV as an additional regressor. Age had a small but unique contribution to focal volume changes. In the VBM analysis of HS patients, detection of abnormalities was strongly influenced by choice of covariates. The optimal combination was different for grey and white matter (for grey matter: TIV; for temporal lobe white matter: TIV, age and gender). A control group size of 70-90 subjects allowed optimal detection of volume loss in the hippocampus and thalamus. At these group sizes, matched control groups did not consistently prove superior to deliberately "unmatched" groups of the same size. The optimal detection of volume loss was obtained with all available control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18467131     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  41 in total

1.  A generalized regression model for region of interest analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Wang; Zhiguo Jiang; Janis J Daly; Guang H Yue
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Paralimbic gray matter reductions in incarcerated adolescent females with psychopathic traits.

Authors:  Lora M Cope; Elsa Ermer; Prashanth K Nyalakanti; Vince D Calhoun; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2014-05

3.  Thalamic-insular dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: evidence from structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua; Luisa Tomelleri; Marcella Bellani; Gianluca Rambaldelli; Roberto Cerini; Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli; Matteo Balestrieri; Michele Tansella; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Brain gray matter correlates of extraversion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies.

Authors:  Han Lai; Song Wang; Yajun Zhao; Lei Zhang; Cheng Yang; Qiyong Gong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Global and regional annual brain volume loss rates in physiological aging.

Authors:  Sven Schippling; Ann-Christin Ostwaldt; Per Suppa; Lothar Spies; Praveena Manogaran; Carola Gocke; Hans-Jürgen Huppertz; Roland Opfer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  A Systematic Characterization of Structural Brain Changes in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Wasana Ediri Arachchi; Yanmin Peng; Xi Zhang; Wen Qin; Chuanjun Zhuo; Chunshui Yu; Meng Liang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Suppressed descending pain modulatory and enhanced sensorimotor networks in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Tianjiao Li; Shuo Zhang; Jiro Kurata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Focal structural changes and cognitive dysfunction in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Authors:  J O'Muircheartaigh; C Vollmar; G J Barker; V Kumari; M R Symms; P Thompson; J S Duncan; M J Koepp; M P Richardson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Structural explanation of poor prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the non-demented state.

Authors:  H-J Kim; S-I Oh; M de Leon; X Wang; K-W Oh; J-S Park; A Deshpande; M Buj; S H Kim
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 6.089

10.  Source-based morphometry of gray matter volume in men with first-episode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tomás Kaspárek; Radek Marecek; Daniel Schwarz; Radovan Prikryl; Jirí Vanícek; Michal Mikl; Eva Cesková
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.