Literature DB >> 18466754

Value representations in the primate striatum during matching behavior.

Brian Lau1, Paul W Glimcher.   

Abstract

Choosing the most valuable course of action requires knowing the outcomes associated with the available alternatives. The striatum may be important for representing the values of actions. We examined this in monkeys performing an oculomotor choice task. The activity of phasically active neurons (PANs) in the striatum covaried with two classes of information: action-values and chosen-values. Action-value PANs were correlated with value estimates for one of the available actions, and these signals were frequently observed before movement execution. Chosen-value PANs were correlated with the value of the action that had been chosen, and these signals were primarily observed later in the task, immediately before or persistently after movement execution. These populations may serve distinct functions mediated by the striatum: some PANs may participate in choice by encoding the values of the available actions, while other PANs may participate in evaluative updating by encoding the reward value of chosen actions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18466754      PMCID: PMC2427158          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  51 in total

1.  Feature-based anticipation of cues that predict reward in monkey caudate nucleus.

Authors:  Johan Lauwereyns; Yoriko Takikawa; Reiko Kawagoe; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Masashi Koizumi; Brian Coe; Masamichi Sakagami; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Optimal firing rate estimation.

Authors:  M G Paulin; L F Hoffman
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  The connections of the dopaminergic system with the striatum in rats and primates: an analysis with respect to the functional and compartmental organization of the striatum.

Authors:  D Joel; I Weiner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Functional differences between macaque prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus during eye movements with and without reward.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kobayashi; Reiko Kawagoe; Yoriko Takikawa; Masashi Koizumi; Masamichi Sakagami; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Responses of tonically active neurons in the primate's striatum undergo systematic changes during behavioral sensorimotor conditioning.

Authors:  T Aosaki; H Tsubokawa; A Ishida; K Watanabe; A M Graybiel; M Kimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tonically discharging putamen neurons exhibit set-dependent responses.

Authors:  M Kimura; J Rajkowski; E Evarts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Peter Dayan; Johannes Schultz; Ralf Deichmann; Karl Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-18       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  179 in total

1.  The prefrontal cortex and hybrid learning during iterative competitive games.

Authors:  Hiroshi Abe; Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Supplementary eye field encodes option and action value for saccades with variable reward.

Authors:  Na-Young So; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Economic choices can be made using only stimulus values.

Authors:  Klaus Wunderlich; Antonio Rangel; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  All that glitters ... dissociating attention and outcome expectancy from prediction errors signals.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Guillem R Esber; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Discrete coding of stimulus value, reward expectation, and reward prediction error in the dorsal striatum.

Authors:  Kei Oyama; Yukina Tateyama; István Hernádi; Philippe N Tobler; Toshio Iijima; Ken-Ichiro Tsutsui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reward Size Informs Repeat-Switch Decisions and Strongly Modulates the Activity of Neurons in Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  The role of supplementary eye field in goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2015-02-23

8.  Dynamical regimes in neural network models of matching behavior.

Authors:  Kiyohito Iigaya; Stefano Fusi
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Dopamine-associated cached values are not sufficient as the basis for action selection.

Authors:  Nick G Hollon; Monica M Arnold; Jerylin O Gan; Mark E Walton; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Behavioral and neural changes after gains and losses of conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.