Literature DB >> 18466410

Smarter than we think: when our brains detect that we are biased.

Wim De Neys1, Oshin Vartanian, Vinod Goel.   

Abstract

Human reasoning is often biased by stereotypical intuitions. The nature of such bias is not clear. Some authors claim that people are mere heuristic thinkers and are not aware that cued stereotypes might be inappropriate. Other authors claim that people always detect the conflict between their stereotypical thinking and normative reasoning, but simply fail to inhibit stereotypical thinking. Hence, it is unclear whether heuristic bias should be attributed to a lack of conflict detection or a failure of inhibition. We introduce a neuroscientific approach that bears on this issue. Participants answered a classic decision-making problem (the "lawyer-engineer" problem) while the activation of brain regions believed to be involved in conflict detection (anterior cingulate) and response inhibition (lateral prefrontal cortex) was monitored. Results showed that although the inhibition area was specifically activated when stereotypical responses were avoided, the conflict-detection area was activated even when people reasoned stereotypically. The findings suggest that people detect their bias when they give intuitive responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18466410     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  23 in total

1.  Rationality and emotionality: serotonin transporter genotype influences reasoning bias.

Authors:  Melanie Stollstorff; Stephanie E Bean; Lindsay M Anderson; Joseph M Devaney; Chandan J Vaidya
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Marie Vandekerckhove; Kris Baetens; Frank Van Overwalle; Ruth Seurinck; Wim Fias
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making.

Authors:  Carissa Bonner; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

4.  Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; Valerie A Thompson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

5.  Situation and person attributions under spontaneous and intentional instructions: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jenny Kestemont; Marie Vandekerckhove; Ning Ma; Nicole Van Hoeck; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The Bat-and-Ball Problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process.

Authors:  Jerome D Hoover; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2019-03-14

7.  The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions.

Authors:  Henry Markovits; Pier-Luc de Chantal; Janie Brisson; Émilie Gagnon-St-Pierre
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

8.  Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; Robert M Ross; Derek J Koehler; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

9.  Feeling we're biased: autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Elke Moyens; Debora Vansteenwegen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Metacognition and abstract reasoning.

Authors:  Henry Markovits; Valerie A Thompson; Janie Brisson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.