Literature DB >> 18465213

Determining bioequivalence of topical dermatological drug products by tape-stripping.

William Navidi1, Ashlyn Hutchinson, Berthe N'Dri-Stempfer, Annette Bunge.   

Abstract

The maximum level of drug in the stratum corneum (C(max)) and the area under the curve of drug level in the stratum corneum versus time (AUC) have been proposed as metrics for assessing bioequivalence of topical drugs. These metrics, which require that concentrations be measured at eight or more times, were developed for drugs that are absorbed into the bloodstream, and are less appropriate for topical drugs. Concentrations of topical drugs are measured by tape-stripping, and it is difficult to make a large number of precise measurements due to the limited amount of available skin. We present a new method (the two-time method) for assessing bioequivalence of topical drugs. The method involves some modifications to standard tape-stripping methodology, designed to reduce the variability in measured drug levels. Perhaps most importantly, drug levels are measured at only two times, one during the uptake phase and one during the clearance phase. Measuring concentrations at only two times allows replicate measurements to be made, which increases efficiency. We compared the performance of the two-time method with a standard method through a simulation study that uses a model based on real data. When two drugs are in fact bioequivalent, the two-time method requires only 20 subjects to achieve the efficiency of a standard study with 50 subjects. In a situation in which two drugs are bioinequivalent, the two-time method requires only 30 subjects to achieve the efficiency of a standard study with 100 subjects.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18465213     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-008-9091-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of dermatopharmacokinetic vs. clinicial efficacy methods for bioequivalence assessment of miconazole nitrate vaginal cream, 2% in humans.

Authors:  Lynn K Pershing; Judy L Corlett; Joel L Nelson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

3.  Pig ear skin ex vivo as a model for in vivo dermatopharmacokinetic studies in man.

Authors:  Christophe Herkenne; Aarti Naik; Yogeshvar N Kalia; Jonathan Hadgraft; Richard H Guy
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Assessment of dermatopharmacokinetic approach in the bioequivalence determination of topical tretinoin gel products.

Authors:  Lynn K Pershing; Joel L Nelson; Judy L Corlett; Surendra P Shrivastava; Don B Hare; Vinod P Shah
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.527

  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Bioequivalence for topical products--an update.

Authors:  Yogeeta Narkar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Improved bioequivalence assessment of topical dermatological drug products using dermatopharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Berthe N'Dri-Stempfer; William C Navidi; Richard H Guy; Annette L Bunge
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Novel Approach for the Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Cream Formulations: Model-Based Analysis of Tape Stripping Data Correctly Concludes BE and BIE.

Authors:  Deniz Ozdin; Isadore Kanfer; Murray P Ducharme
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Rapid sampling of molecules via skin for diagnostic and forensic applications.

Authors:  Sumit Paliwal; Makoto Ogura; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  The Implications of Regulatory Framework for Topical Semisolid Drug Products: From Critical Quality and Performance Attributes towards Establishing Bioequivalence.

Authors:  Tanja Ilić; Ivana Pantelić; Snežana Savić
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.