Literature DB >> 18465118

Patterns of dioxin-altered mRNA expression in livers of dioxin-sensitive versus dioxin-resistant rats.

Monique A Franc1, Ivy D Moffat, Paul C Boutros, Jouni T Tuomisto, Jouko Tuomisto, Raimo Pohjanvirta, Allan B Okey.   

Abstract

Dioxins exert their major toxicologic effects by binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and altering gene transcription. Numerous dioxin-responsive genes previously were identified both by conventional biochemical and molecular techniques and by recent mRNA expression microarray studies. However, of the large set of dioxin-responsive genes the specific genes whose dysregulation leads to death remain unknown. To identify specific genes that may be involved in dioxin lethality we compared changes in liver mRNA levels following exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in three strains/lines of dioxin-sensitive rats with changes in three dioxin-resistant rat strains/lines. The three dioxin-resistant strains/lines all harbor a large deletion in the transactivation domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). Despite this deletion, many genes exhibited a "Type-I" response-that is, their responses were similar in dioxin-sensitive and dioxin-resistant rats. Several genes that previously were well established as being dioxin-responsive or under AHR regulation emerged as Type-I responses (e.g. CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1 and Gsta3). In contrast, a relatively small number of genes exhibited a Type-II response-defined as a difference in responsiveness between dioxin-sensitive and dioxin-resistant rat strains. Type-II genes include: malic enzyme 1, ubiquitin C, cathepsin L, S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase and ferritin light chain 1. In silico searches revealed that AH response elements are conserved in the 5'-flanking regions of several genes that respond to TCDD in both the Type-I and Type-II categories. The vast majority of changes in mRNA levels in response to 100 microg/kg TCDD were strain-specific; over 75% of the dioxin-responsive clones were affected in only one of the six strains/lines. Selected genes were assessed by quantitative RT-PCR in dose-response and time-course experiments and responses of some genes were assessed in Ahr-null mice to determine if their response was AHR-dependent. Type-II genes may lie in pathways that are central to the difference in susceptibility to TCDD lethality in this animal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18465118     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-008-0303-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  12 in total

1.  Systematic evaluation of medium-throughput mRNA abundance platforms.

Authors:  Stephenie D Prokopec; John D Watson; Daryl M Waggott; Ashley B Smith; Alexander H Wu; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Flavin-containing monooxygenase-3: induction by 3-methylcholanthrene and complex regulation by xenobiotic chemicals in hepatoma cells and mouse liver.

Authors:  Trine Celius; Andrea Pansoy; Jason Matthews; Allan B Okey; Marilyn C Henderson; Sharon K Krueger; David E Williams
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-regulated transcriptomic changes in rats sensitive or resistant to major dioxin toxicities.

Authors:  Ivy D Moffat; Paul C Boutros; Hanbo Chen; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Identification of stanniocalcin 2 as a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor target gene.

Authors:  Tod A Harper; Aditya D Joshi; Cornelis J Elferink
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  High-density real-time PCR-based in vivo toxicogenomic screen to predict organ-specific toxicity.

Authors:  Gabriella Fabian; Nora Farago; Liliana Z Feher; Lajos I Nagy; Sandor Kulin; Klara Kitajka; Tamas Bito; Vilmos Tubak; Robert L Katona; Laszlo Tiszlavicz; Laszlo G Puskas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Toxicogenomic analysis of exposure to TCDD, PCB126 and PCB153: identification of genomic biomarkers of exposure to AhR ligands.

Authors:  Bladimir J Ovando; Corie A Ellison; Chad M Vezina; James R Olson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Transcriptomic assessment of resistance to effects of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonist in embryos of Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) from a marine Superfund site.

Authors:  Marjorie F Oleksiak; Sibel I Karchner; Matthew J Jenny; Diana G Franks; David B Mark Welch; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  mRNA levels in control rat liver display strain-specific, hereditary, and AHR-dependent components.

Authors:  Paul C Boutros; Ivy D Moffat; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dioxin-dependent and dioxin-independent gene batteries: comparison of liver and kidney in AHR-null mice.

Authors:  Paul C Boutros; Kirsten A Bielefeld; Raimo Pohjanvirta; Patricia A Harper
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Genetic modification of the association between peripubertal dioxin exposure and pubertal onset in a cohort of Russian boys.

Authors:  Olivier Humblet; Susan A Korrick; Paige L Williams; Oleg Sergeyev; Claude Emond; Linda S Birnbaum; Jane S Burns; Larisa M Altshul; Donald G Patterson; Wayman E Turner; Mary M Lee; Boris Revich; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.