OBJECTIVE: Balneotherapy (or spa therapy, mineral baths) for patients with arthritis is one of the oldest forms of therapy. We assessed effectiveness of balneotherapy for patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We performed a broad search strategy to retrieve eligible studies, selecting randomized controlled trials comparing balneotherapy with any intervention or with no intervention. Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. Disagreements were solved by consensus. In the event of clinical heterogeneity or lack of data we refrained from statistical pooling. RESULTS: Seven trials (498 patients) were included in this review: one performed an intention-to-treat analysis, 2 provided data for our own analysis, and one reported a "quality of life" outcome. We found silver-level evidence of mineral baths compared to no treatment (effect sizes 0.34-1.82). Adverse events were not measured or found in included trials. CONCLUSION: We found silver-level evidence concerning the beneficial effects of mineral baths compared to no treatment. Of all other balneological treatments, no clear effects were found. However, the scientific evidence is weak because of the poor methodological quality and the absence of an adequate statistical analysis and data presentation.
OBJECTIVE: Balneotherapy (or spa therapy, mineral baths) for patients with arthritis is one of the oldest forms of therapy. We assessed effectiveness of balneotherapy for patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We performed a broad search strategy to retrieve eligible studies, selecting randomized controlled trials comparing balneotherapy with any intervention or with no intervention. Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. Disagreements were solved by consensus. In the event of clinical heterogeneity or lack of data we refrained from statistical pooling. RESULTS: Seven trials (498 patients) were included in this review: one performed an intention-to-treat analysis, 2 provided data for our own analysis, and one reported a "quality of life" outcome. We found silver-level evidence of mineral baths compared to no treatment (effect sizes 0.34-1.82). Adverse events were not measured or found in included trials. CONCLUSION: We found silver-level evidence concerning the beneficial effects of mineral baths compared to no treatment. Of all other balneological treatments, no clear effects were found. However, the scientific evidence is weak because of the poor methodological quality and the absence of an adequate statistical analysis and data presentation.
Authors: Ildikó Katalin Tefner; András Németh; Andrea Lászlófi; Tímea Kis; Gyula Gyetvai; Tamás Bender Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: E Ortega; I Gálvez; M D Hinchado; J Guerrero; L Martín-Cordero; S Torres-Piles Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2017-04-29 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Bo Chen; Hongsheng Zhan; Mei Chung; Xun Lin; Min Zhang; Jian Pang; Chenchen Wang Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: R Forestier; H Desfour; J-M Tessier; A Françon; A M Foote; C Genty; C Rolland; C-F Roques; J-L Bosson Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 19.103