BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have shown the anticancer potential of HMG-CoA reductase enzyme inhibitors (statins), whereas epidemiologic studies remain controversial. Because lipophilic statins show preclinical anticancer activity against hormone receptor [estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)]-negative breast cancer models, we explored the hormone receptor phenotype of breast cancers that arise in statin users. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort analysis via electronic pharmacy records from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Cancer Registry on 2,141 female patients listed in 2003 as incident cases of breast malignancy. Measures included tumor grade, stage, and receptor phenotype in statin users versus nonusers and controlled for hormone replacement therapy and race. RESULTS: 387 of the 2,141 breast cancer patients used lipophilic statins [lovastatin (85%), simvastatin, and atorvastatin]. Fifty-one women developed ER/PR-negative tumors. The age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of developing an ER/PR negative tumor was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.92; P = 0.02) for statin use >or=1 year before breast cancer diagnosis compared with statin use <1 year (including nonuse). Breast cancers in patients with >or=1 year of statin use were more likely to be low grade (OR, 1.44) and less invasive stage (OR, 1.42). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients with exposure to statins have proportionately fewer ER/PR-negative tumors that are of lower grade and stage. Although our data set cannot address whether statins affect the incidence of breast cancer, we show that statin use may influence the phenotype of tumors. This suggests a new potential strategy for breast cancer prevention, that of combining statins with agents that prevent ER-positive cancer (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors).
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have shown the anticancer potential of HMG-CoA reductase enzyme inhibitors (statins), whereas epidemiologic studies remain controversial. Because lipophilic statins show preclinical anticancer activity against hormone receptor [estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)]-negative breast cancer models, we explored the hormone receptor phenotype of breast cancers that arise in statin users. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort analysis via electronic pharmacy records from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Cancer Registry on 2,141 female patients listed in 2003 as incident cases of breast malignancy. Measures included tumor grade, stage, and receptor phenotype in statin users versus nonusers and controlled for hormone replacement therapy and race. RESULTS: 387 of the 2,141 breast cancerpatients used lipophilic statins [lovastatin (85%), simvastatin, and atorvastatin]. Fifty-one women developed ER/PR-negative tumors. The age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of developing an ER/PR negative tumor was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.92; P = 0.02) for statin use >or=1 year before breast cancer diagnosis compared with statin use <1 year (including nonuse). Breast cancers in patients with >or=1 year of statin use were more likely to be low grade (OR, 1.44) and less invasive stage (OR, 1.42). CONCLUSIONS:Breast cancerpatients with exposure to statins have proportionately fewer ER/PR-negative tumors that are of lower grade and stage. Although our data set cannot address whether statins affect the incidence of breast cancer, we show that statin use may influence the phenotype of tumors. This suggests a new potential strategy for breast cancer prevention, that of combining statins with agents that prevent ER-positive cancer (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors).
Authors: Stephan Woditschka; Laurel A Habel; Natalia Udaltsova; Gary D Friedman; Weiva Sieh Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Thomas P Ahern; Lars Pedersen; Maja Tarp; Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Jens Peter Garne; Rebecca A Silliman; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Timothy L Lash Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kristine Pelton; Christine M Coticchia; Adam S Curatolo; Carl P Schaffner; David Zurakowski; Keith R Solomon; Marsha A Moses Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: YongLi Ji; Tiffany Rounds; Abigail Crocker; Betsy Sussman; Russell C Hovey; Fonda Kingsley; Hyman B Muss; Judy E Garber; Marie E Wood Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-02-23
Authors: William A Freed-Pastor; Hideaki Mizuno; Xi Zhao; Anita Langerød; Sung-Hwan Moon; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Anthony Barsotti; Agustin Chicas; Wencheng Li; Alla Polotskaia; Mina J Bissell; Timothy F Osborne; Bin Tian; Scott W Lowe; Jose M Silva; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Arnold J Levine; Jill Bargonetti; Carol Prives Journal: Cell Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Signe Borgquist; Annika Jögi; Fredrik Pontén; Lisa Rydén; Donal J Brennan; Karin Jirström Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Jelena Klawitter; Touraj Shokati; Vanessa Moll; Uwe Christians; Jost Klawitter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 6.466