Literature DB >> 18463157

The prevalence of intragenic deletions in patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and Kallmann syndrome.

Jennifer R Pedersen-White1, Lynn P Chorich, David P Bick, Richard J Sherins, Lawrence C Layman.   

Abstract

Idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) and Kallmann syndrome (KS) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders caused by a deficiency of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Mutations in three genes--KAL1, GNRHR and FGFR1--account for 15-20% of all causes of IHH/KS. Nearly all mutations are point mutations identified by traditional PCR-based DNA sequencing. The relatively new method of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) has been successful for detecting intragenic deletions in other genetic diseases. We hypothesized that MLPA would detect intragenic deletions in approximately 15-20% of our cohort of IHH/KS patients. Fifty-four IHH/KS patients were studied for KAL1 deletions and 100 were studied for an autosomal panel of FGFR1, GNRH1, GNRHR, GPR54 and NELF gene deletions. Of all male and female subjects screened, 4/54 (7.4%) had KAL1 deletions. If only anosmic males were considered, 4/33 (12.1%) had KAL1 deletions. No deletions were identified in any of the autosomal genes in 100 IHH/KS patients. We believe this to be the first study to use MLPA to identify intragenic deletions in IHH/KS patients. Our results indicate approximately 12% of KS males have KAL1 deletions, but intragenic deletions of the FGFR1, GNRH1, GNRHR, GPR54 and NELF genes are uncommon in IHH/KS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18463157      PMCID: PMC2434956          DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gan027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


Introduction

Idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) is comprised of absent puberty, infertility and low serum gonadotrophins in the absence of a pituitary tumor. IHH is due to impaired gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) release/action or gonadotrophin secretion. Kallmann syndrome (KS) consists of IHH with anosmia. KS appears to be the result of impairment of GnRH and olfactory neuron migration from the olfactory placode to the hypothalamus (Bhagavath and Layman, 2007). Mutations in genes involved in GnRH neuron migration (KAL1 and FGFR1), as well as those expressed in either the hypothalamus or pituitary, including GNRHR, NROB1, GPR54, LEP, LEPR and PCSK1 account for the molecular etiology of ∼15–20% of all IHH/KS patients (Hardelin, 2001; de Roux, 2005; Pitteloud ; Bhagavath and Layman, 2007; Seminara, 2007). Three genes—KAL1, GNRHR and FGFR1—account for the majority of causative mutations. The molecular basis for most IHH/KS cases, however, remains unknown. Digenic disease has been reported in two families with FGFR1 and either a GNRHR or a NELF mutation (Pitteloud ). Most mutations identified in genetic diseases, including IHH/KS, are point mutations and small deletions/duplications detected by PCR-based DNA sequencing (Kim ). PCR based sequencing may not detect heterozygous gene deletions, however, since the remaining normal allele will be amplified. Therefore, it is possible that a substantial number of mutations remain undiagnosed. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a relatively new method for detecting copy number variations in genomic sequences (Schouten ). MLPA involves overnight hybridization of adjacent primer pairs to the individual exons of multiple target genes simultaneously, followed by a ligation reaction of the probe pairs, which then serve as a template for multiplex PCR. Each ligated probe has a varying length of ‘stuffer’ sequences that produce different sized fragments for resolution based upon size (Schouten ). Since all probes have identical primer binding sites, only a single primer pair is required for multiplex PCR of all genes being studied. Heterozygous intragenic deletions have been found in 15–20% of patients with cystic fibrosis (Audrezet ), deafness (Del Castillo ) and breast/ovarian cancer (Hogervorst ) who did not have point mutations in the corresponding genes. We hypothesized that a similar percentage of IHH/KS patients would have heterozygous deletions of autosomal genes (FGFR1, GNRH1, GNRHR, GPR54 or NELF) and/or hemizygous KAL1 gene deletions, deletions which would be missed by the traditional PCR-based sequencing methods. Additionally, since KAL1 has a pseudogene homolog on the Y chromosome, this may complicate the DNA sequencing analysis (Del Castillo ).

Materials and Methods

Patients

One-hundred and twelve probands with IHH/KS were studied by MLPA (Table I). The diagnosis of IHH was based upon criteria published previously—absent/impaired puberty by age ≥17 in girls and age ≥18 in boys, low serum gonadotrophins, no evidence of a pituitary tumor and otherwise normal pituitary function (Crowley ; Bhagavath ). All males had total testosterone <100 ng/dl (normal 300–1100 ng/dl), and all females had hypoestrogenic amenorrhea. Complete IHH was defined as absent breast development in females and testicular size ≤3 ml in males (Bhagavath ). Incomplete IHH suggested the presence of prior steroid production and was defined as breast development of Tanner ≥2 in females and testis size >3 ml in males. Patient characteristics are shown in Table I. The Medical College of Georgia Human Assurance Committee approved this study; each patient signed informed consent.
Table I.

Classification of patients by gene(s) tested.

KAL1 KitKAL2 KitKAL1&KAL2 KitsTotal Patients Studied
All subjects studied n = 54All subjects studied n = 100Studied with both kits n = 42Individual subjects n = 112 (154–42)
Male45Male72Male38Male79
Anosmic/Hypos33Anosmic/Hypos37Anosmic/Hypos26Anosmic/Hypos44
Normosmic12Normosmic18Normosmic12Normosmic18
Unknown0Unknown17Unknown0Unknown17
Complete IHH13Complete IHH15Complete IHH10Complete IHH18
Incomplete IHH20Incomplete IHH19Incomplete IHH18Incomplete IHH21
Unknown12Unknown38Unknown10Unknown40
Female9Female28Female4Female33
Anosmic/Hypos7Anosmic/Hypos7Anosmic/Hypos3Anosmic/Hypos11
Normosmic2Normosmic10Normosmic1Normosmic11
Unknown0Unknown11Unknown0Unknown11
Complete IHH3Complete IHH7Complete IHH2Complete IHH8
Incomplete IHH2Incomplete IHH6Incomplete IHH0Incomplete IHH8
Unknown4Unknown15Unknown2Unknown17
Totals54Totals100Totals42Totals112
Anosmic/Hypos40Anosmic/Hypos44Anosmic/Hypos29Anosmic/Hypos55
Normosmic14Normosmic28Normosmic13Normosmic29
Unknown0Unknown28Unknown0Unknown28
Complete IHH16Complete IHH22Complete IHH12Complete IHH26
Incomplete IHH22Incomplete IHH25Incomplete IHH18Incomplete IHH29
Unknown16Unknown53Unknown12Unknown57
Classification of patients by gene(s) tested. Fifty-four patients were studied for the presence of KAL1 deletions (KAL1 kit) and 100 IHH/KS patients were studied for deletions of an autosomal panel of FGFR1, GNRH1, GNRHR, GPR54 and NELF genes (KAL2 kit). We estimated that we needed a sample size of ∼50 for study of KAL1 gene deletions, since the prevalence of mutations is about 6% in anosmic males (Bhagavath ). The sample size for the autosomal gene panel (KAL2 kit) was estimated to be ∼100. The prevalence of FGFR1 mutations in both normosmic IHH and KS is about 10% (Pitteloud ), whereas GNRHR mutations occur in 3–4% of normosmic IHH (Bhagavath ). This sample should allow detection if they occur in this frequency. The prevalence of GNRH1, NELF and GPR54 mutations in IHH and KS is currently unknown, but is probably low. By screening ∼100 patients, we could determine if the prevalence was at least 1%. KAL1 gene deletions were studied in 45 males and nine females. Since KAL1 mutations have been exclusively identified in anosmic/hyposmic patients, the majority of patients studied (40/54) were anosmic/hyposmic. All patients were randomly selected from available DNA samples without regard to prior mutation analysis from our large IHH/KS cohort.

Molecular analysis/MLPA

DNA was extracted from white blood cells in all IHH/KS using standard methods. MLPA was performed in patients according to Schouten (Schouten ; Hogervorst ). A total of 125 ng of DNA was hybridized overnight to the probe sets of the commercially available kits. The P132 KAL1 kit (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands) contains 34 probe pairs for all 14 KAL1 exons and control sequences for other regions on Xp, Xq and Yq11. The P133 KAL2 kit contains 39 probe pairs covering the following exons of autosomal genes: GNRH1 (exons 1–3 of 4 exons), GNRHR (exons 1–3 of 3 exons), GPR54 (exons 1, 4 and 5 of 5 exons), FGFR1 (1–3, 5, 6, 8,10,13,14 and 18 of 18 exons) and NELF (exons 5, 11 and 15 of 16 exons). These probes also include control sequences on chromosomes 1–3, 6, 11, 15–17, 19, 20 and Y. Following hybridization, a ligation reaction was performed which served as a template for 35 cycles of multiplex PCR using universal primers. PCR products were analyzed on an ABI 310 autoanalyzer using the Gene Scan program and data were evaluated using Genotyper 2.0 (both from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Peak areas for each exon were converted into an Excel file and the relative copy number of each fragment was compared to the same fragments from 2 to 3 controls. MLPA was repeated at least three times for patients with putative deletions. Deletions were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing (Bhagavath ).

Results

Using MLPA for the KAL1 gene, deletions were identified in 4/54 (7.4%) patients and in 4/40 (10%) of anosmic/hyposmic patients (Table II). When only anosmic males were considered, KAL1 deletions were present in 4/33 (12.1%). Three whole gene deletions were detected, as indicated by absence of peaks for each exon (Fig. 1). All three whole gene deletions were confirmed by the absence of bands by PCR. In one of these patients, deletion of exons 1–13 had previously been identified (Bhagavath ); however, DNA sequencing of exon 14 was consistent with pseudogene sequence, thereby confirming the whole gene deletion by MLPA. One patient had an exon 4 deletion (Fig. 1) which, upon DNA sequencing, revealed a 3 bp deletion (TGT) of codon 164, deleting a Cys (Cys164del) rather than the deletion of the entire exon. No heterozygous/homozygous deletions were identified in the FGFR1, GNRH1, GNRHR, GPR54 or NELF genes in 100 IHH/KS patients.
Table II.

Summary of KAL1 exon/gene deletions.

Deletion typeSexSmellIHH severityFamily history/comments
Whole GeneMaleAnosmicIncompleteNone
Whole GeneMaleHyposmicCompleteVisual Field abnormality
Whole GeneMaleAnosmicCompleteTwo first cousins with KS
Exon 4MaleAnosmicIncompleteRenal Agenesis
Figure 1:

MLPA results demonstrating.

(A) The KAL1 exon 4 deletion; (B) whole KAL1 gene deletion; (C) normal control. Arrows indicate the deleted exons. The horizontal axis (top) shows the size of the fragment in base pairs. A difference in relative copy peak height or peak area indicates a copy number change of the probe target sequence.

MLPA results demonstrating. (A) The KAL1 exon 4 deletion; (B) whole KAL1 gene deletion; (C) normal control. Arrows indicate the deleted exons. The horizontal axis (top) shows the size of the fragment in base pairs. A difference in relative copy peak height or peak area indicates a copy number change of the probe target sequence. Summary of KAL1 exon/gene deletions.

Discussion

The genetic basis of IHH/KS has been identified in 15–20% of patients, most commonly in KAL1, GNRHR or FGFR1 genes (Bhagavath and Layman, 2007). KAL1 mutations have been identified in anosmic males—approximately 5% of KS males without a family history and 30–70% of those with clear X-linked recessive inheritance (Bhagavath ). GNRHR mutations cause autosomal recessive IHH in ∼3–5% of IHH patients, all of whom are normosmic (Bhagavath ). Interestingly, FGFR1 mutations occur in ∼10% of anosmic or normosmic patients (Pitteloud ). Nearly all mutations in these genes are point mutations or small deletions/insertions. In contrast, only a very few gross deletions been identified in IHH/KS candidate genes. Available prevalence studies likely underestimate IHH/KS gene deletions as traditional PCR-based DNA sequencing is unable to detect heterozygous gene deletions. Therefore, it is possible that a substantial number of mutations remain undiagnosed. Using MLPA, heterozygous intragenic deletions have been found in 15–20% of patients with cystic fibrosis (Audrezet ), deafness (Del Castillo ) and breast/ovarian cancer (Hogervorst ) who did not have point mutations. MLPA is an effective technique used to detect genomic deletions and duplications (Schouten ). If probe pairs for individual exons are utilized, MLPA can successfully determine the relative copy number of all exons within gene/genes simultaneously. MLPA has gained acceptance in genetic diagnostic laboratories due to its simplicity, relatively low cost and capacity for reasonably high throughput analysis. MLPA has a variety of applications in addition to detection of deletions/duplications. Other important uses include aneuploidy detection (Gerdes ), analysis of DNA methylation (Procter ), relative mRNA quantification (Wehner ), chromosomal characterization of cell lines and tissue samples (Wilting ) and the detection of polymorphisms (Volikos ). The frequency of gene deletions in IHH/KS candidate genes has not been previously reported. We hypothesized that MLPA would identify intragenic deletions in ∼15–20% of IHH/KS patients. Using MLPA, we discovered that 7.4% of 54 patients had KAL1 deletions. If only anosmic males were considered, 4/33 (12.1%) had KAL1 deletions. Three patients had whole gene deletions—one of which was previously described by PCR to be deleted of exons 1–13 (Bhagavath ). PCR and DNA sequencing subsequently confirmed a whole gene deletion in this patient. MLPA also revealed one subject who appeared to have a deletion of exon 4. In this case, DNA sequencing revealed a 3 bp deletion rather than an entire exon deletion. It is likely that the probe pair did not specifically anneal to the template of exon 4, therefore, no ligation and subsequent PCR could be performed (Schouten ). Our findings indicate that putative deletions indicate identified by MLPA requires confirmation by another technique. We also used MLPA to screen for heterozygous intragenic deletions of five autosomal genes—FGFR1, GNRH1, GNRHR, GPR54 and NELF. Surprisingly, no deletions were identified in 100 IHH/KS patients. Probe pairs were dispersed across the coding regions of these genes, affording the opportunity to detect intragenic deletions. Only three exons were studied for the NELF gene, but at the time that this kit was designed, no NELF mutations had been described. We cannot exclude that intragenic deletions of exons not included in the kits occur, which would underestimate the prevalence of intragenic gene deletions. Nevertheless, no deletions of any of the five autosomal genes were identified in 100 IHH/KS patients. Although the prevalence of deletions in IHH/KS in autosomal genes was much less than that expected, the prevalence of KAL1 deletions approximated 10–15% that we hypothesized. The findings from this pilot study demonstrate the feasibility of MLPA to detect deletions in IHH/KS and suggest the benefits of future studies with an increased sample size of IHH/KS.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grants HD33004 and HD040287 (L.C.L).
  21 in total

1.  Large genomic deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene identified by a novel quantitative method.

Authors:  Frans B L Hogervorst; Petra M Nederlof; Johan J P Gille; Cathal J McElgunn; Maartje Grippeling; Roelof Pruntel; Rein Regnerus; Tibor van Welsem; Resie van Spaendonk; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Charlotte Dommering; Senno Verhoef; Jan P Schouten; Laura J van't Veer; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Jan P Schouten; Cathal J McElgunn; Raymond Waaijer; Danny Zwijnenburg; Filip Diepvens; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

Authors:  Tommy Gerdes; Maria Kirchhoff; Anne-Marie Lind; Gitte Vestergaard Larsen; Marianne Schwartz; Claes Lundsteen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  KAL1 mutations are not a common cause of idiopathic hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism in humans.

Authors:  Balasubramanian Bhagavath; Ning Xu; Metin Ozata; Robert L Rosenfield; David P Bick; Richard J Sherins; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 5.  Kallmann syndrome: towards molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  J P Hardelin
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 6.  The genetics of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Authors:  Balasubramanian Bhagavath; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Structure of the X-linked Kallmann syndrome gene and its homologous pseudogene on the Y chromosome.

Authors:  I del Castillo; M Cohen-Salmon; S Blanchard; G Lutfalla; C Petit
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genomic rearrangements in the CFTR gene: extensive allelic heterogeneity and diverse mutational mechanisms.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Audrézet; Jian-Min Chen; Odile Raguénès; Nadia Chuzhanova; Karine Giteau; Cédric Le Maréchal; Isabelle Quéré; David N Cooper; Claude Férec
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 9.  The physiology of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion in men and women.

Authors:  W F Crowley; M Filicori; D I Spratt; N F Santoro
Journal:  Recent Prog Horm Res       Date:  1985

10.  Prevalence and evolutionary origins of the del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation in the DFNB1 locus in hearing-impaired subjects: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ignacio Del Castillo; Miguel A Moreno-Pelayo; Francisco J Del Castillo; Zippora Brownstein; Sandrine Marlin; Quint Adina; David J Cockburn; Arti Pandya; Kirby R Siemering; G Parker Chamberlin; Ester Ballana; Wim Wuyts; Andréa Trevas Maciel-Guerra; Araceli Alvarez; Manuela Villamar; Mordechai Shohat; Dvorah Abeliovich; Hans-Henrik M Dahl; Xavier Estivill; Paolo Gasparini; Tim Hutchin; Walter E Nance; Edi L Sartorato; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp; Karen B Avraham; Christine Petit; Felipe Moreno
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  A needle in a haystack: mutations in GNRH1 as a rare cause of isolated GnRH deficiency.

Authors:  Yee-Ming Chan
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 2.  Genotype and phenotype of patients with gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor mutations.

Authors:  Hyung-Goo Kim; Jennifer Pedersen-White; Balasubramanian Bhagavath; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Front Horm Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 3.  Genetic counseling for isolated GnRH deficiency.

Authors:  Margaret G Au; William F Crowley; Cassandra L Buck
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  Nasal embryonic LHRH factor (NELF) mutations in patients with normosmic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and Kallmann syndrome.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Hyung-Goo Kim; Balasubramanian Bhagavath; Sung-Gyu Cho; Jae Ho Lee; Kyungsoo Ha; Irene Meliciani; Wolfgang Wenzel; Robert H Podolsky; Lynn P Chorich; Kathryn A Stackhouse; Anna M H Grove; Lawrence N Odom; Metin Ozata; David P Bick; Richard J Sherins; Soo-Hyun Kim; Richard S Cameron; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Oligogenic basis of isolated gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency.

Authors:  Gerasimos P Sykiotis; Lacey Plummer; Virginia A Hughes; Margaret Au; Sadia Durrani; Sadhana Nayak-Young; Andrew A Dwyer; Richard Quinton; Janet E Hall; James F Gusella; Stephanie B Seminara; William F Crowley; Nelly Pitteloud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The genetic basis of female reproductive disorders: etiology and clinical testing.

Authors:  Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.102

7.  Molecular basis for the Kallmann syndrome-linked fibroblast growth factor receptor mutation.

Authors:  Ryan D Thurman; Karuppanan Muthusamy Kathir; Dakshinamurthy Rajalingam; Thallapuranam K Suresh Kumar
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Mutations in CHD7, encoding a chromatin-remodeling protein, cause idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and Kallmann syndrome.

Authors:  Hyung-Goo Kim; Ingo Kurth; Fei Lan; Irene Meliciani; Wolfgang Wenzel; Soo Hyun Eom; Gil Bu Kang; Georg Rosenberger; Mustafa Tekin; Metin Ozata; David P Bick; Richard J Sherins; Steven L Walker; Yang Shi; James F Gusella; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Diagnosis of diseases of steroid hormone production, metabolism and action.

Authors:  John W Honour
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-02

Review 10.  A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia.

Authors:  Alaa J Hamada; Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.