INTRODUCTION: The recommended sick leave after hysterectomy varies among operating wards and depends on many non-medical issues. The recommendation is rarely validated scientifically and is often without any connection to the women's actual handling of the leave if this is not recorded as part of a project. We analysed the postoperative period for a group of hysterectomised women who kept a diary over eight weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2006 all hysterectomised women entered the diary project if they fulfilled the following criteria: the operation was indicated by meno-metrorrhagia, dysplasia, pressure symptoms or pain, she was under 60, she was Danish-speaking and in full-time work which was to be recommenced after operation. Women were excluded if they were operated for descended uterus, if a major re-operation was performed or, unexpectedly, endometriosis or malignancy was found. Our ward's recommendation on sick leave was four weeks for vaginal hysterectomy and six weeks for abdominal hysterectomy, but with emphasis on the necessary individualization of sick leave. Once a week, the women answered eight questions on their well-being and activities in the diary and returned the diary. RESULTS: In total, 71 women entered the study, 27 with vaginal hysterectomy and 44 with abdominal hysterectomy. After one week, none of the women suffered from nausea or discomfort, while 20% were still complaining of pain. Less than half of the women had commenced work one week after the recommended sick leave. At that time, two thirds had recommenced their former leisure activities but less than half of the women's sex lives were as before the operation. CONCLUSION: The majority of women extend their sick leave beyond the recommended period on their own initiative, despite the ward's long recommended period of sick leave. It is questionable whether the actual period of sick leave can be cut by shortening the recommended sick leave.
INTRODUCTION: The recommended sick leave after hysterectomy varies among operating wards and depends on many non-medical issues. The recommendation is rarely validated scientifically and is often without any connection to the women's actual handling of the leave if this is not recorded as part of a project. We analysed the postoperative period for a group of hysterectomised women who kept a diary over eight weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2006 all hysterectomised women entered the diary project if they fulfilled the following criteria: the operation was indicated by meno-metrorrhagia, dysplasia, pressure symptoms or pain, she was under 60, she was Danish-speaking and in full-time work which was to be recommenced after operation. Women were excluded if they were operated for descended uterus, if a major re-operation was performed or, unexpectedly, endometriosis or malignancy was found. Our ward's recommendation on sick leave was four weeks for vaginal hysterectomy and six weeks for abdominal hysterectomy, but with emphasis on the necessary individualization of sick leave. Once a week, the women answered eight questions on their well-being and activities in the diary and returned the diary. RESULTS: In total, 71 women entered the study, 27 with vaginal hysterectomy and 44 with abdominal hysterectomy. After one week, none of the women suffered from nausea or discomfort, while 20% were still complaining of pain. Less than half of the women had commenced work one week after the recommended sick leave. At that time, two thirds had recommenced their former leisure activities but less than half of the women's sex lives were as before the operation. CONCLUSION: The majority of women extend their sick leave beyond the recommended period on their own initiative, despite the ward's long recommended period of sick leave. It is questionable whether the actual period of sick leave can be cut by shortening the recommended sick leave.
Authors: Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Hans A M Brölmann; Mark H Emanuel; Paul J M van Kesteren; Gunilla Kleiverda; Jos P Lips; Alexander Mozes; Andreas L Thurkow; Willem van Mechelen; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Eva van der Meij; Judith Af Huirne; A Dorien Ten Cate; Hein Bac Stockmann; Piet C Scholten; Paul Hp Davids; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes R Anema Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Eva van der Meij; Esther V A Bouwsma; Baukje van den Heuvel; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes R Anema; Judith A F Huirne Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Eva van der Meij; Judith Af Huirne; Esther Va Bouwsma; Johanna M van Dongen; Caroline B Terwee; Peter M van de Ven; Chantal M den Bakker; Suzan van der Meij; W Marchien van Baal; Wouter Kg Leclercq; Peggy Maj Geomini; Esther Cj Consten; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul Jm van Kesteren; Hein Bac Stockmann; A Dorien Ten Cate; Paul Hp Davids; Petrus C Scholten; Baukje van den Heuvel; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Wilhelmus Jhj Meijerink; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes R Anema Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-12-21
Authors: Chantal M den Bakker; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Eva van der Meij; Wilhelmus Jhj Meijerink; Baukje van den Heuvel; Astrid H Baan; Paul Hp Davids; Petrus C Scholten; Suzan van der Meij; W Marchien van Baal; Annette D van Dalsen; Daniel J Lips; Jan Willem van der Steeg; Wouter Kg Leclercq; Peggy Maj Geomini; Esther Cj Consten; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steve Mm de Castro; Paul Jm van Kesteren; Huib A Cense; Hein Bac Stockmann; A Dorien Ten Cate; Hendrik J Bonjer; Judith Af Huirne; Johannes R Anema Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Suzanne J Dedden; Esther V A Bouwsma; Peggy M A J Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Judith A F Huirne Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Carina A Pittens; Willem van Mechelen; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Esther Va Bouwsma; Johannes R Anema; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Dirk L Knol; Judith E Bosmans; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul Jm van Kesteren; W Marchien van Baal; Jos P Lips; Mark H Emanuel; Petrus C Scholten; Alexander Mozes; Albert H Adriaanse; Hans Am Brölmann; Judith Af Huirne Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2014-06-18
Authors: Esther V A Bouwsma; Judith A F Huirne; Peter M van de Ven; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul J M van Kesteren; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 2.692