Literature DB >> 1846254

Successful prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease after primary CMV exposure in liver transplant recipients.

R J Stratta1, M S Shaefer, K A Cushing, R S Markin, R P Wood, A N Langnas, E C Reed, G L Woods, J P Donovan, T J Pillen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: During a 38-month period, we studied 320 liver transplants in 283 recipients (202 adults, 81 children). CMV disease was documented in 85 patients (30.0%) The major risk factor for CMV disease was primary CMV exposure (transplanting a seropositive allograft into a seronegative recipient). A total of 42 patients (14.8%) had primary CMV exposure. Twenty-one patients were historical controls, while the next 21 received prophylaxis for CMV infection in a nonrandomized trial of consecutive study groups. The regimen of prophylaxis consisted of intravenous immune globulin (IgG; 0.5 g/kg) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks and acyclovir for 3 months. CMV prophylaxis resulted in a dramatic reduction in the incidence of CMV disease (71.4% vs. 23.8%, (P less than 0.01). All cases of CMV were treated with intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 14 days), with 5 patients in the control group developing recurrent CMV disease (33.3% relapse). In the 16 patients receiving prophylaxis who did not develop CMV disease, all developed positive CMV-IgG titers with the passive administration of IgG. However, none developed any evidence of CMV infection or viral shedding as assessed by IgM titers and surveillance viral cultures. Four deaths occurred (all control patients), but none were related to CMV disease. Overall patient and graft survivals after primary CMV exposure were 90.5% and 82.2%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 14 months.
CONCLUSION: Primary CMV exposure is a major risk factor for CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. Intravenous IgG plus acyclovir is safe and effective in preventing CMV infection and disease in this setting. Because of the scarcity of donor organs, we do not advocate protective matching to avoid primary CMV exposure but rather recommend prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in this high-risk group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1846254     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199101000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

Review 1.  Infections in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  R Patel; C V Paya
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Prospective cytomegalovirus surveillance in paediatric renal transplant patients.

Authors:  S Iragorri; D Pillay; M Scrine; R S Trompeter; L Rees; P D Griffiths
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Ganciclovir prophylaxis decreases frequency and severity of cytomegalovirus disease in seropositive liver transplant recipients treated with OKT3 monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  C Lumbreras; J R Otero; J A Herrero; R Gomez; M Lizasoain; J M Aguado; F Colina; I Garcia; E Moreno; A R Noriega
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Aciclovir. A reappraisal of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  A J Wagstaff; D Faulds; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.