BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sensitizations require alternative forms of treatment, as the efficacy of conventional immunotherapy is unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we sought to compare the efficacy of a subcutaneously (s.c.) and a mucosally applied polyvalent vaccine to reduce allergic immune responses within airway and lung tissues. METHODS: Female BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally immunized with recombinant (r)Bet v 1, rPhl p 1 and rPhl p 5, followed by an aerosol challenge of birch and phleum pollen extract. For tolerance induction, either a mixture of the immunodominant peptides or a hybrid peptide of the respective antigens was s.c. injected or intranasally applied before poly-sensitization. RESULTS: Mucosal but not systemic pre-treatment with poly-peptides led to significant suppression of eosinophils and IL-5 production in bronchoalveolar lavages, as well as IL-5, IL-4, IL-13 and eotaxin levels in lung cell cultures. Lung histology showed a clear reduction of cellular infiltration and mucus production only in intranasally pre-treated mice. In accordance, also the systemic immune response, characterized by IgE-dependent basophil degranulation and IL-4 levels in vitro, was significantly reduced by mucosal antigen application, but only marginally influenced by subcutaneous pre-treatment. Both treatment routes led to up-regulated CTLA4 expression in splenocytes, whereas only after mucosal pre-treatment Foxp3 expression levels were enhanced in lung CD3(+) T cells. Furthermore, intranasal but not subcutaneous application of the peptides enhanced IL-10 levels in the lungs, indicating regulatory mechanisms operating in local tolerance induction. CONCLUSION: Mucosal application of peptides is superior to systemic application in preventing both local and systemic poly-allergic T helper2 immune responses, suggesting mucosal tolerance induction as an attractive strategy for the primary and secondary prevention of allergic multi-sensitization and lung pathology.
BACKGROUND:Patients with multiple sensitizations require alternative forms of treatment, as the efficacy of conventional immunotherapy is unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we sought to compare the efficacy of a subcutaneously (s.c.) and a mucosally applied polyvalent vaccine to reduce allergic immune responses within airway and lung tissues. METHODS: Female BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally immunized with recombinant (r)Bet v 1, rPhl p 1 and rPhl p 5, followed by an aerosol challenge of birch and phleum pollen extract. For tolerance induction, either a mixture of the immunodominant peptides or a hybrid peptide of the respective antigens was s.c. injected or intranasally applied before poly-sensitization. RESULTS: Mucosal but not systemic pre-treatment with poly-peptides led to significant suppression of eosinophils and IL-5 production in bronchoalveolar lavages, as well as IL-5, IL-4, IL-13 and eotaxin levels in lung cell cultures. Lung histology showed a clear reduction of cellular infiltration and mucus production only in intranasally pre-treated mice. In accordance, also the systemic immune response, characterized by IgE-dependent basophil degranulation and IL-4 levels in vitro, was significantly reduced by mucosal antigen application, but only marginally influenced by subcutaneous pre-treatment. Both treatment routes led to up-regulated CTLA4 expression in splenocytes, whereas only after mucosal pre-treatment Foxp3 expression levels were enhanced in lung CD3(+) T cells. Furthermore, intranasal but not subcutaneous application of the peptides enhanced IL-10 levels in the lungs, indicating regulatory mechanisms operating in local tolerance induction. CONCLUSION: Mucosal application of peptides is superior to systemic application in preventing both local and systemic poly-allergic T helper2 immune responses, suggesting mucosal tolerance induction as an attractive strategy for the primary and secondary prevention of allergic multi-sensitization and lung pathology.
Authors: Elisabeth Hoflehner; Karin Hufnagl; Irma Schabussova; Joanna Jasinska; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Barbara Bohle; Rick M Maizels; Ursula Wiedermann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 3.240