Literature DB >> 18462181

Internet healthcare: do self-diagnosis sites do more harm than good?

Angela Ryan, Sue Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growth of the Internet has enabled the public to more readily access information about health and disease. Available websites include those that provide possible diagnoses for particular symptoms and those that then assist people to decide whether to self-treat or consult a doctor.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible impact of the use of self-diagnosis websites.
METHODS: Self-diagnosis websites were reviewed and existing literature in this area was considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Although information about possible diagnoses and their management has previously been available through books and leaflets, the development of self-diagnosis websites is different for several reasons. This editorial highlights these differences and possible harms and benefits that could arise from the use of self-diagnosis websites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18462181     DOI: 10.1517/14740338.7.3.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  12 in total

1.  Use of the internet to assist in the treatment of depression and anxiety: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alan G Wade
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

2.  Why Physician Guidance Matters: A Night of Neuralgia, Meningitis, and WebMD.

Authors:  Anson Au
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Problem-Based mHealth Literacy Scale (PB-mHLS): Development and Validation.

Authors:  Lingmin Zhang; Pengxiang Li
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.947

4.  Older adult experience of online diagnosis: results from a scenario-based think-aloud protocol.

Authors:  Tana M Luger; Thomas K Houston; Jerry Suls
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Finding a depression app: a review and content analysis of the depression app marketplace.

Authors:  Nelson Shen; Michael-Jane Levitan; Andrew Johnson; Jacqueline Lorene Bender; Michelle Hamilton-Page; Alejandro Alex R Jadad; David Wiljer
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 6.  Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Tasha Glenn; Scott Monteith; Rita Bauer; Peter C Whybrow; John Geddes
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2017-02-07

7.  Patient perspectives of the experience of a computerized cognitive assessment in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Jen-Ai Lai; Julia M Wu; Tanya L Feng; Sherri Hayden
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-10

8.  EULAR 'points to consider' for the conduction of workforce requirement studies in rheumatology.

Authors:  Sofia Ramiro; Frank Buttgereit; Christian Dejaco; Polina Putrik; Julia Unger; Daniel Aletaha; Gerolamo Bianchi; Johannes W Bijlsma; Annelies Boonen; Nada Cikes; Axel Finckh; Laure Gossec; Tore K Kvien; Joao Madruga Dias; Eric L Matteson; Francisca Sivera; Tanja A Stamm; Zoltan Szekanecz; Dieter Wiek; Angela Zink
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-12-05

9.  Income-Generating Processes of Free Web-Based Digital Health Tools to Engage Patients: Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Lai; Raisa Deber; Alejandro R Jadad; Aviv Shachak
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool to Assess Patient Information on Appendicitis Websites: Systematic Search and Evaluation.

Authors:  Shahi Ghani; Ka Siu Fan; Ka Hay Fan; Lorenzo Lenti; Dimitri Raptis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.