Literature DB >> 18461369

Temporal patterns in ambient noise of biological origin from a shallow water temperate reef.

Craig A Radford1, Andrew G Jeffs, Chris T Tindle, John C Montgomery.   

Abstract

A systematic study of the ambient noise in the shallow coastal waters of north-eastern New Zealand shows large temporal variability in acoustic power levels between seasons, moon phase and the time of day. Ambient noise levels were highest during the new moon and the lowest during the full moon. Ambient noise levels were also significantly higher during summer and lower during winter. Bandpass filtering (700-2,000 Hz and 2-15 kHz), combined with snap counts and data from other studies show that the majority of the sound intensity increases could be attributed to two organisms: the sea urchin and the snapping shrimp. The increased intensity of biologically produced sound during dusk, new moon and summer could enhance the biological signature of a reef and transmit it further offshore. Ambient noise generated from the coast, especially reefs, has been implicated as playing a role in guiding pelagic post-larval fish and crustaceans to settlement habitats. Determining a causal link between temporal increases in ambient noise and higher rates of settlement of reef fish and crustaceans would provide support for the importance of ambient underwater sound in guiding the settlement of these organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18461369     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1041-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Patterns of fish calling in a nearshore environment in the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  R D McCauley; D H Cato
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles.

Authors:  M Versluis; B Schmitz; A von der Heydt; D Lohse
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Acoustic detection and communication by decapod crustaceans.

Authors:  A N Popper; M Salmon; K W Horch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Homeward sound.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Mark Meekan; John Montgomery; Rob McCauley; Andrew Jeffs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Sound as an orientation cue for the pelagic larvae of reef fishes and decapod crustaceans.

Authors:  John C Montgomery; Andrew Jeffs; Stephen D Simpson; Mark Meekan; Chris Tindle
Journal:  Adv Mar Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.143

Review 6.  Are larvae of demersal fishes plankton or nekton?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Leis
Journal:  Adv Mar Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.143

7.  Diversity in frequency response properties of saccular afferents of the toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  R R Fay; P L Edds-Walton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Sound detection and processing by fish: critical review and major research questions.

Authors:  A N Popper; R R Fay
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Underwater, low-frequency noise in a coastal sea turtle habitat.

Authors:  Y Samuel; S J Morreale; C W Clark; C H Greene; M E Richmond
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: the auditory brainstem response approach.

Authors:  T N Kenyon; F Ladich; H Y Yan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.836

  10 in total
  24 in total

1.  Location, location, location: finding a suitable home among the noise.

Authors:  Jenni A Stanley; Craig A Radford; Andrew G Jeffs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Silent oceans: ocean acidification impoverishes natural soundscapes by altering sound production of the world's noisiest marine invertebrate.

Authors:  Tullio Rossi; Sean D Connell; Ivan Nagelkerken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Inducers of settlement and moulting in post-larval spiny lobster.

Authors:  Jenni A Stanley; Jan Hesse; Iván A Hinojosa; Andrew G Jeffs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Acoustic particle motion detection in the snapping shrimp (Alpheus richardsoni).

Authors:  Jason P Dinh; Craig Radford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ocean acidification effects on fish hearing.

Authors:  C A Radford; S P Collins; P L Munday; D Parsons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Acoustic indexes for marine biodiversity trends and ecosystem health.

Authors:  Nadia Pieretti; Roberto Danovaro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Adaptive avoidance of reef noise.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford; Edward J Tickle; Mark G Meekan; Andrew G Jeffs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Turbine sound may influence the metamorphosis behaviour of estuarine crab megalopae.

Authors:  Matthew K Pine; Andrew G Jeffs; Craig A Radford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Measuring acoustic habitats.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Kurt M Fristrup; Mark P Johnson; Peter L Tyack; Matthew J Witt; Philippe Blondel; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 7.781

10.  Contrasting fish behavior in artificial seascapes with implications for resources conservation.

Authors:  Barbara Koeck; Josep Alós; Anthony Caro; Reda Neveu; Romain Crec'hriou; Gilles Saragoni; Philippe Lenfant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.