Literature DB >> 18461102

NMR analysis of lipoprotein particle size does not increase sensitivity to the effect of soy protein on CVD risk when compared with the traditional lipid profile.

Antonio S Santo1, Ariana M Cunningham, Sofiya Alhassan, Richard W Browne, Harold Burton, John J Leddy, Peter W Grandjean, Steven M Horvath, Peter J Horvath.   

Abstract

The traditional lipid profile compared with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) may underestimate the risk for cardiovascular disease and may explain some of the discrepancies in results between studies analyzing the salubrious effects of soy. Our purpose was to compare the traditional lipid profile with NMR quantification of the number of lipoprotein particles, subclasses, and diameters or sizes in 30 sedentary males, between 18 and 30 years of age, consuming 1 of the following 3 supplements daily for 28 days: milk protein (Milk), isoflavone-poor soy protein (Soy-), or isoflavone-rich soy protein (Soy+). The study used a double-blind, parallel-arm design with random assignment to 1 of the 3 protein supplement groups. Fasting EDTA blood samples were collected at baseline and after 28 days of supplementation and analyzed for the number and size of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles, respectively. Fasting serum samples were analyzed for concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), total HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), HDL(2)-C, HDL(3)-C, triglycerides (TGs), free fatty acids (FFAs), and glucose. Fasting heparin blood samples were collected at baseline and after supplementation and analyzed for apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, B, C-II, C-III, and E, as well as hepatic and lipoprotein lipase concentrations. HDL3-C increased by 47.2% after Soy+ supplementation and hepatic lipase decreased 19.2% after Soy- supplementation (p < 0.05). HDL-C and apolipoproteins A-I and A-II were found to increase in all 3 groups (p < 0.05). Results support that NMR analysis of lipoprotein particle number and size are not more sensitive to the effect of soy protein on CVD risk compared with the traditional lipid profile. Furthermore, the lack of isoflavones in soy protein seems to have a deleterious effect on hepatic lipase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18461102     DOI: 10.1139/H08-023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  4 in total

1.  Postprandial lipemia detects the effect of soy protein on cardiovascular disease risk compared with the fasting lipid profile.

Authors:  Antonio S Santo; Ariana M Santo; Richard W Browne; Harold Burton; John J Leddy; Steven M Horvath; Peter J Horvath
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  A Meta-Analysis of 46 Studies Identified by the FDA Demonstrates that Soy Protein Decreases Circulating LDL and Total Cholesterol Concentrations in Adults.

Authors:  Sonia Blanco Mejia; Mark Messina; Siying S Li; Effie Viguiliouk; Laura Chiavaroli; Tauseef A Khan; Korbua Srichaikul; Arash Mirrahimi; John L Sievenpiper; Penny Kris-Etherton; David J A Jenkins
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Effect of Plant Protein on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Siying S Li; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Lyubov Lytvyn; Sarah E Stewart; Effie Viguiliouk; Vanessa Ha; Russell J de Souza; Lawrence A Leiter; Cyril W C Kendall; David J A Jenkins; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Cumulative Meta-Analysis of the Soy Effect Over Time.

Authors:  David J A Jenkins; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Laura Chiavaroli; Effie Viguiliouk; Siying S Li; Cyril W C Kendall; Vladmir Vuksan; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.