Literature DB >> 18460992

Gender differences in bicycle saddle pressure distribution during seated cycling.

James J Potter1, Julie L Sauer, Christine L Weisshaar, Darryl G Thelen, Heidi-Lynn Ploeg.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of gender, power, hand position, and ischial tuberosity (IT) width on saddle pressure during seated stationary cycling.
METHODS: Twenty-two experienced cyclists (11 males and 11 females) were fitted to an adjustable stationary bicycle and pedaled at 100 and 200 W in both the tops and drops hand positions. An instrumented pressure mat was used to record saddle pressure distribution. Normalized force, maximum sensor pressure, and center of pressure were computed for anterior and posterior regions of the saddle.
RESULTS: When increasing power from 100 to 200 W, there were significant reductions in normalized force in all saddle regions and maximum pressure in the posterior region. When moving from the tops to drops hand position, centers of pressure in all regions moved forward, normalized force and maximum pressure on the posterior region decreased, and females (but not males) exhibited an increase in normalized force and maximum pressure in the anterior region. Male centers of pressure were farther forward in the anterior and total saddle regions than they were for females. Females exhibited a larger IT width than males. Interindividual differences in IT width were significantly correlated with the posterior center of pressure fore-aft location on the saddle in the tops and drops hand positions and with the width between the posterior left and right centers of pressure in the tops hand position.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant gender-related differences in saddle loading which are important to consider when designing saddles. These differences are especially important when riders are in the handlebar drops and more weight is supported on the anterior pelvic structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460992     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181666eea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  8 in total

1.  The bar sinister: does handlebar level damage the pelvic floor in female cyclists?

Authors:  Sarah N Partin; Kathleen A Connell; Steven Schrader; Julie LaCombe; Brian Lowe; Anne Sweeney; Susan Reutman; Andrea Wang; Christine Toennis; Arnold Melman; Madgy Mikhail; Marsha K Guess
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 2.  Mountain biking injuries in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kylee B Aleman; Michael C Meyers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Les lanternes rouges: the race for information about cycling-related female sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Sarah N Partin; Kathleen A Connell; Steven M Schrader; Marsha K Guess
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  A preliminary study of the measurement of external ischial tuberosity width and its gender differences.

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen; Ping-Jui Yang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Biomechanical Comparison of Shorts With Different Pads: An Insight into the Perineum Protection Issue.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marcolin; Nicola Petrone; Carlo Reggiani; Fausto A Panizzolo; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Effect of Oscillation on Perineal Pressure in Cyclists: Implications for Micro-Trauma.

Authors:  Thomas Sanford; Adam J Gadzinski; Thomas Gaither; E Charles Osterberg; Greg P Murphy; Peter R Carroll; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.491

7.  Postural Variabilities Associated with the Most Comfortable Sitting Postures: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen; You-Chun Chan; Li-Peng Zhang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06

8.  Changes in external ischial tuberosity width at varying trunk-thigh angles between sexes using two measurement methods.

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.