Literature DB >> 18460399

Impact of different tongue cleaning methods on the bacterial load of the tongue dorsum.

Alice Bordas1, Rod McNab, Angela M Staples, Jim Bowman, Joe Kanapka, Marylynn P Bosma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and duration of the effect of tongue cleaning procedures on bacterial load on the dorsal surface of the tongue.
METHODS: 19 subjects participated in this blinded crossover study. Subjects abstained from oral hygiene, eating and drinking from 22:00 h the previous evening. Tongue samples were collected at baseline and within 15 minutes of one of three procedures: teeth brushing alone; teeth brushing plus tongue scraping; teeth brushing plus tongue cleaning using a high speed vacuum ejector and irrigation with 20 ml antibacterial mouthwash. Subjects then brushed twice daily for 3 days apart from the second group who additionally scraped their tongue twice daily. On day 4, baseline and post-treatment samples were collected as per day 1. Bacteria (total anaerobes, Gram-negative anaerobes, VSC-producing bacteria and Streptococcus saliuarius) were enumerated using appropriate selective media.
RESULTS: The tongue dorsum was colonized by all 4 bacterial categories (log(10) 6-8 cfu/sample). For subjects who brushed their teeth only, there was a significant reduction from baseline for S. saliuarius only. In contrast, tooth brushing plus tongue scraping resulted in statistically significant reductions from baseline for all bacterial categories (range log(10) 0.11-0.40 cfu/sample). Highly statistically significant reductions (log(10) 1.11-1.96 cfu/sample) were observed for subjects who underwent thorough tongue cleaning with the saliva ejector/mouthwash. To determine longevity of treatment effects, baseline bacterial loads for days 1 and 4 were compared. Only daily tongue scraping resulted in statistical significant reduction in baseline microbial loads on day 4.
CONCLUSION: While mechanical tongue cleaning with or without chemical intervention can reduce bacterial load on the tongue, this effect is transient, and regular tongue cleaning is required to provide a long lasting (overnight) reduction in bacterial numbers. Nevertheless, tongue cleaning is an oral hygiene procedure that is little practiced due to discomfort and/or lack of awareness on the part of dental professionals and their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460399     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9969(08)70004-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  17 in total

1.  Interventions for managing halitosis.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Eswara Uma; Vijendra Pal Singh; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Eby Varghese
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-11

2.  The short-term treatment effects on the microbiota at the dorsum of the tongue in intra-oral halitosis patients--a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Seida Erovic Ademovski; G Rutger Persson; Edwin Winkel; Albert Tangerman; Peter Lingström; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effectiveness of three oral hygiene regimens on oral malodor reduction: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ei Ei Aung; Masayuki Ueno; Takashi Zaitsu; Sayaka Furukawa; Yoko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Evaluation of the effect of three supplementary oral hygiene measures on salivary mutans streptococci levels in children: A randomized comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  M Manju; P Prathyusha; Elizabeth Joseph; Rupali Borkar Kaul; Srinivas L Shanthraj; Ntasha Sethi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  Tongue Microbiota and Oral Health Status in Community-Dwelling Elderly Adults.

Authors:  Mikari Asakawa; Toru Takeshita; Michiko Furuta; Shinya Kageyama; Kenji Takeuchi; Jun Hata; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Yoshihisa Yamashita
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.389

6.  Susceptibility of oral bacteria to antibacterial photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Si-Mook Kang; Hoi-In Jung; Baek-Il Kim
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.474

7.  How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto; Sandra Sato; Vinícius Pedrazzi
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-11

8.  Effects of tongue cleaning on bacterial flora in tongue coating and dental plaque: a crossover study.

Authors:  Miki Matsui; Naoyuki Chosa; Yu Shimoyama; Kentaro Minami; Shigenobu Kimura; Mitsuo Kishi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Evaluation of the Bacterial Diversity in the Human Tongue Coating Based on Genus-Specific Primers for 16S rRNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Beili Sun; Dongrui Zhou; Jing Tu; Zuhong Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Photodynamic therapy with Bixa orellana extract and LED for the reduction of halitosis: study protocol for a randomized, microbiological and clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcela Leticia Leal Gonçalves; Ana Carolina Costa da Mota; Alessandro Melo Deana; Guelton Hirano Guedes; Lisyanne Araújo de Souza Cavalcante; Renato Araújo Prates; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana; Christiane Pavani; Lara Jansiski Motta; Greice de Brito Bitencourt; Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes; Monica da Consolação Canuto Salgueiro; Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari; Daniela Fátima Teixeira da Silva; Cristiane Miranda França; Sandra Kalil Bussadori
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.